Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorGustad, Lise Tuset
dc.contributor.authorBangstad, Inger-Lise
dc.contributor.authorTorsvik, Malvin Arnold
dc.contributor.authorRise, Marit By
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-23T10:12:27Z
dc.date.available2024-01-23T10:12:27Z
dc.date.created2024-01-19T14:50:55Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.identifier.issn1178-2390
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3113288
dc.description.abstractPurpose: Previous research has explored nurses´ experience with the implementation of early detection alert systems, and nurses and physicians’ perceptions of sepsis management and use of sepsis triage. As one of the first, this study aims to investigate the perceived usefulness of an interdisciplinary quality improvement project including standardized sepsis patient pathway to improve the early identification and treatment of sepsis patients. Participants and Methods: This study was a qualitative study that employed semi-structured interviews with thirteen ward nurses and five ward physicians recruited by convenience and respondent-driven sampling, respectively. The interviews explored the perceived usefulness of mutual training in sepsis care in medical hospital wards. We applied Systematic Text Condensation to analyze the experiences and knowledge of professional identification and cooperation in early identification of sepsis patients. Results: The results revealed three main themes: Awareness of sepsis, collaboration between nurses and physicians, and clinical assessment and judgement. The findings highlighted the positive impact of the project in terms of raising awareness, improving communication, and enhancing the ability to detect and treat sepsis. The study also identified the importance of repetition and reminders to maintain awareness, the need for ongoing training for new healthcare professionals, and the challenges of collaboration and decision-making processes. Conclusion: The sepsis intervention seemed successful in improving awareness of sepsis and enhancing interprofessional collaboration between nurses and physicians. Health professionals continued to rely on their clinical judgment but increased the use of objective measurements and communication of vital signs. Continuous repetition and education for new colleagues were identified as important factors for the sustainability of the intervention. Overall, the study highlights the importance of standardized protocols and training for early detection and management of sepsis in healthcare settings.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherDovepressen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse-Ikkekommersiell 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleNurses' and Physicians' Experiences After Implementation of a Quality Improvement Project to Improve Sepsis Awareness in Hospitalsen_US
dc.title.alternativeNurses' and Physicians' Experiences After Implementation of a Quality Improvement Project to Improve Sepsis Awareness in Hospitalsen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.source.pagenumber29-41en_US
dc.source.volume17en_US
dc.source.journalJournal of Multidisciplinary Healthcareen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.2147/JMDH.S439017
dc.identifier.cristin2230651
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse-Ikkekommersiell 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse-Ikkekommersiell 4.0 Internasjonal