Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDon, Christopher
dc.contributor.authorShalvey, Thomas
dc.contributor.authorSmiles, Matthew
dc.contributor.authorThomas, Luke
dc.contributor.authorPhillips, Laurie
dc.contributor.authorHobson, Theodore
dc.contributor.authorFinch, Harry
dc.contributor.authorJones, Leanne
dc.contributor.authorSwallow, Jack
dc.contributor.authorFleck, Nicole
dc.contributor.authorMarkwell, Christopher
dc.contributor.authorThakur, Pardeep
dc.contributor.authorLee, Tien-Lin
dc.contributor.authorBiswas, Deepnarayan
dc.contributor.authorBowen, Leon
dc.contributor.authorWilliamson, Benjamin Albert Dobson
dc.contributor.authorScanlon, David O.
dc.contributor.authorDhanak, Vinod
dc.contributor.authorDurose, Vinod
dc.contributor.authorVeal, Tim D
dc.contributor.authorMajor, Jonathan
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-11T10:46:41Z
dc.date.available2023-10-11T10:46:41Z
dc.date.created2023-06-21T08:51:03Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.issn2196-7350
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3095772
dc.description.abstractDespite the recent success of CdS/Sb2Se3 heterojunction devices, cadmium toxicity, parasitic absorption from the relatively narrow CdS band gap (2.4 eV) and multiple reports of inter-diffusion at the interface forming Cd(S,Se) and Sb2(S,Se)3 phases, present significant limitations to this device architecture. Among the options for alternative partner layers in antimony chalcogenide solar cells, the wide band gap, non-toxic titanium dioxide (TiO2) has demonstrated the most promise. It is generally accepted that the anatase phase of the polymorphic TiO2 is preferred, although there is currently an absence of analysis with regard to phase influence on device performance. This work reports approaches to distinguish between TiO2 phases using both surface and bulk characterization methods. A device fabricated with a radio frequency (RF) magnetron sputtered rutile-TiO2 window layer (FTO/TiO2/Sb2Se3/P3HT/Au) achieved an efficiency of 6.88% and near-record short–circuit current density (Jsc) of 32.44 mA cm−2, which is comparable to established solution based TiO2 fabrication methods that produced a highly anatase-TiO2 partner layer and a 6.91% efficiency device. The sputtered method introduces reproducibility challenges via the enhancement of interfacial charge barriers in multi-phase TiO2 films with a rutile surface and anatase bulk. This is shown to introduce severe S-shaped current–voltage (J–V) distortion and a drastic fill–factor (FF) reduction in these devices.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherWiley-VCH GmbHen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleMulti-Phase Sputtered TiO<inf>2</inf>-Induced Current–Voltage Distortion in Sb<inf>2</inf>Se<inf>3</inf> Solar Cellsen_US
dc.title.alternativeMulti-Phase Sputtered TiO<inf>2</inf>-Induced Current–Voltage Distortion in Sb<inf>2</inf>Se<inf>3</inf> Solar Cellsen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.source.volume10en_US
dc.source.journalAdvanced Materials Interfacesen_US
dc.source.issue20en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/admi.202300238
dc.identifier.cristin2156397
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal