Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLeipoldt, Jonathan David
dc.contributor.authorHarder, Annemiek T.
dc.contributor.authorKayed, Nanna Sønnichsen
dc.contributor.authorGrietens, Hans
dc.contributor.authorRimehaug, Tormod
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-20T09:50:07Z
dc.date.available2023-03-20T09:50:07Z
dc.date.created2022-04-11T10:59:58Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationChildren and Youth Services Review. 2022, 134 .en_US
dc.identifier.issn0190-7409
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3059166
dc.description.abstractBackground Limited research exists on how therapeutic residential youth care (TRC) achieves treatment outcomes. More specifically, little is known about the association between contextual factors such as treatment organization, youth characteristics, and experienced social climate in TRC. Therefore, this study aims to investigate differences between latent classes of TRC and youth characteristics and their association with a positive perceived social TRC climate. Method We applied a person-centered approach in a cross-sectional design with a sample of 400 adolescents and 142 staff leaders. We analyzed youth and TRC characteristics in a latent class analysis and established associations with social climate for these two groupings. Results The two types of TRC settings we found, i.e., larger TRC settings and family-style TRC settings, show small differences in social climate. These settings only differed on youth activities and staff shifts type (more cohabitation and unorganized activities outside TRC in family-style TRC). We identified four adolescent classes: A severe problems group, youth with incidental problems, family problems, and a migrant background group. The migrant background group showed the most positive perceptions of social climate, followed by youth with incidental problems, family problems, and severe problems. Conclusions TRC staff should acknowledge how perceived social climate is connected to TRC characteristics and the heterogeneity of adolescents in care. As social climate is subjective and dynamic, a continuous dialogue about TRC social climate between staff and youth is recommended. Future research should investigate how these aspects are associated with treatment outcomes to increase our understanding of achieving positive outcomes in TRC.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherElsevier B. V.en_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleThe interplay of youth and care characteristics with a positive social climate in therapeutic residential youth careen_US
dc.title.alternativeThe interplay of youth and care characteristics with a positive social climate in therapeutic residential youth careen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.source.pagenumber17en_US
dc.source.volume134en_US
dc.source.journalChildren and Youth Services Reviewen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.childyouth.2021.106348
dc.identifier.cristin2016662
dc.source.articlenumber106348en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal