Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorBerker, Thomas
dc.contributor.authorMüller, Liana
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-13T13:07:03Z
dc.date.available2023-03-13T13:07:03Z
dc.date.created2022-10-17T18:18:04Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationPublic Understanding of Science. 2022, .en_US
dc.identifier.issn0963-6625
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3057970
dc.description.abstractIn a little more than 10 years, Norway went from being a laggard in low energy construction to mandatory Passive House energy consumption levels for all new buildings. This is a remarkable story of expert-led sustainable change, in which considerable resistance had to be overcome. Based on a distant and a close reading of Norwegian print media coverage of low energy buildings between 2005 and 2012, we analyse one aspect of this success story: representations of research-based expert authority. Our empirical study is motivated by a concern for expert authority in conflicts that arise when sustainability policies are implemented. We found three distinct, but complementary groups of representations, cautious dissemination of research findings, open engagement in public controversies, and seductive ‘home stories’. In a division of labour, we argue, they were able to assert research-based authority that persisted despite heated public controversies.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherSAGE Publications Ltden_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse-Ikkekommersiell 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleSeduction, caution, fight: Media framing of research-based expertise in Norwegian print media coverage of low energy buildings (2005–2012)en_US
dc.title.alternativeSeduction, caution, fight: Media framing of research-based expertise in Norwegian print media coverage of low energy buildings (2005–2012)en_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.source.pagenumber88-102en_US
dc.source.volume32en_US
dc.source.journalPublic Understanding of Scienceen_US
dc.source.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/09636625221122293
dc.identifier.cristin2062218
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse-Ikkekommersiell 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse-Ikkekommersiell 4.0 Internasjonal