Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorTomás-Jiménez, Manuel
dc.contributor.authorRoldán-Merino, Juan Francisco
dc.contributor.authorSanchez-Balcells, Sara
dc.contributor.authorSchröder, Ingrid Agneta
dc.contributor.authorLundqvist, Lars-Olov
dc.contributor.authorPuig-Llobet, Montserrat
dc.contributor.authorMoreno-Poyato, Antonio R.
dc.contributor.authorDomínguez del Campo, Marta
dc.contributor.authorLluch-Canut, Maria Teresa
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-30T13:30:40Z
dc.date.available2023-01-30T13:30:40Z
dc.date.created2022-11-30T12:36:28Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationBMC Nursing. 2022, 21 .en_US
dc.identifier.issn1472-6955
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3047156
dc.description.abstractBackground Health systems in the field of mental health are strongly committed to community models that allow patients to be attended in their own environment. This helps them to maintain their family and social ties while trying to avoid costly hospital admissions. The patients’ perspective is a key component in the assessment of the quality of psychiatric care and can even determine their adherence to the devices where they are treated. However, there are few instruments with adequate psychometric properties for the evaluation of the quality of psychiatric care in community mental health. The Quality in Psychiatric Care – Outpatient (QPC-OP) instrument has adequate psychometric properties to assess the quality of psychiatric care from the patients’ perspective. The aim of this study was to adapt and validate the Spanish version of the QPC-OP instrument. Methods A translation and back-translation of the instrument was carried out. To examine its psychometric properties, the instrument was administered to 200 patients attending various community mental health services. To assess test-retest reliability, the instrument was readministered after 7-14 days (n = 98). Results The Confirmatory Factor Analysis revealed a structure of 8 factors identical to the original version, with an adequate model fit. The internal consistency coefficient (Cronbach’s alpha) was 0.951. The intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.764 (95% IC: 0.649 – 0.842), and higher than 0.70 in 5 of the 8 factors. Additionally, an EFA was performed and revealed that the instrument could behave in a unifactorial or four factor manner in the sample analyzed. Conclusions Results show that the Spanish version of the QPC-OP instrument is valid and reliable for the assessment of quality of psychiatric care in the community setting.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherBMCen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleSpanish adaptation of the quality in psychiatric care-outpatient (QPC-OP) instrument community mental health patients’ version: psychometric properties and factor structureen_US
dc.title.alternativeSpanish adaptation of the quality in psychiatric care-outpatient (QPC-OP) instrument community mental health patients’ version: psychometric properties and factor structureen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.source.pagenumber11en_US
dc.source.volume21en_US
dc.source.journalBMC Nursingen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12912-022-01094-8
dc.identifier.cristin2085572
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal