dc.contributor.author | Amaya, Yonas Tesema | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-11-28T10:12:56Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-11-28T10:12:56Z | |
dc.date.created | 2021-10-25T14:40:30Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2021 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Forum for Development Studies. 2021, 49 (1), 53-76. | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0803-9410 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/11250/3034411 | |
dc.description.abstract | In this article, I explore some of the implications of state land policy as an approach to analyzing the double dispossession – land and labor dispossessions. Despite a growing interest in the study of land dispossession in the global South, especially after the post-2008 financial crisis, examining the complexities between the land policy, land and labor dispossessions have relatively been overlooked. I discuss how the state’s land policy contributes to coercive land dispossession and how this aspect of dispossession becomes the precondition for the second dispossession – labor. The people who lost their land to investments concurrently lost their employment, and a new class of landless and jobless farmers is emerging. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | Taylor & Francis | en_US |
dc.rights | Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal | * |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.no | * |
dc.title | Interrogating Dispossession for Development in Ethiopia | en_US |
dc.title.alternative | Interrogating Dispossession for Development in Ethiopia | en_US |
dc.type | Peer reviewed | en_US |
dc.type | Journal article | en_US |
dc.description.version | publishedVersion | en_US |
dc.source.pagenumber | 53-76 | en_US |
dc.source.volume | 49 | en_US |
dc.source.journal | Forum for Development Studies | en_US |
dc.source.issue | 1 | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1080/08039410.2021.1984305 | |
dc.identifier.cristin | 1948315 | |
cristin.ispublished | true | |
cristin.fulltext | original | |
cristin.qualitycode | 1 | |