Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorShoabjareh, Azamsadat Hosseini
dc.contributor.authorMamdoohi, Amir Reza
dc.contributor.authorNordfjærn, Trond
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-08T12:39:35Z
dc.date.available2022-09-08T12:39:35Z
dc.date.created2021-04-27T11:51:50Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.issn0001-4575
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3016644
dc.description.abstractCrash statistics indicate that the number of pedestrian fatalities has been increasing at an alarming rate in Iran. Crossing over non-designed places is a main cause of traffic crashes among pedestrians. This study aimed to investigate how perceptions about walking facilities and risk-taking affect pedestrians’ crossing behaviour. A stated preference questionnaire was designed and a random sample of 390 pedestrians were interviewed face-to-face in two regions of Tehran with three options for pedestrians to cross (overpass, zebra crossing, and non-designed places (NDP)). Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) resulted in three latent dimensions: risk-taking/conformity, pedestrians’ perception of overpass, and NDP. Then, data were classified based on latent variables using K-means cluster analysis. Clustering resulted in four groups: group 1 (Cautious; negative perception of overpasses; positive perception of NDP), group 2 (Cautious; negative perception of overpasses; negative perception of NDP), group 3 (Cautious; positive perception of overpasses; negative perception of NDP), and group 4 (Risk-taker; negative perception of overpasses; negative perception of NDP). Finally, a Multinomial Logit Model (MNL) was developed for four groups of pedestrians. The results show that pedestrians’ behaviour differentiate based on latent variables. It was found that being accompanied by a child increases the probability of using an overpass even for pedestrians in group 4 with high risk-taking propensity, but it was more important for pedestrians in group 3 who held positive perceptions of overpasses and negative perceptions of NDP. Also, during congestion, group 4 was more inclined to cross at NDP. It was concluded that in the first group, unsafe choices among student respondents could be associated with their facility perceptions rather than their risk-taking/conformity. Results of this study can be helpful in selecting more appropriate locations for overpasses and crosswalks installation based on pedestrians’ behaviour.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.titleAnalysis of Pedestrians’ Behavior: A Segmentation Approach Based on Latent Variablesen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderThis version of the article will not be available due to copyright restrictions by Elsevieren_US
dc.source.volume157en_US
dc.source.journalAccident Analysis and Preventionen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.aap.2021.106160
dc.identifier.cristin1906662
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record