Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorLasabuda, Amando Putra Ersaid
dc.contributor.authorJohansen, Nora
dc.contributor.authorLaberg, Jan Sverre
dc.contributor.authorFaleide, Jan Inge
dc.contributor.authorSenger, Kim
dc.contributor.authorRydningen, Tom Arne
dc.contributor.authorPatton, Henry
dc.contributor.authorKnutsen, Stig-Morten
dc.contributor.authorHanssen, Alfred
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-16T07:40:06Z
dc.date.available2021-04-16T07:40:06Z
dc.date.created2021-03-29T08:18:59Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationEarth-Science Reviews. 2021, 217, .en_US
dc.identifier.issn0012-8252
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2738012
dc.description.abstractUplift and erosion are complex phenomena in terms of their governing processes, precise timing and exact magnitude. The intricate relationship between different geodynamic processes leading to uplift may increase uncertainties in estimating spatial and temporal patterns. Sediment distribution from uplifted (and eroded) topography and the corresponding paleoenvironmental reconstructions require reliable constrains. The Barents Shelf provides a unique arena to study uplift and erosion due to extensive seismic and well data attributed to high petroleum activity. This particular interest has led to a voluminous literature about this topic over the last three decades. Here, we present the current status of the Cenozoic uplift and erosion on the Norwegian Barents Shelf by reviewing the key terminology, its tectonic history and paleoenvironment, methods in quantifying uplift and erosion, as well as timing and possible mechanisms. Our new erosion maps show an increase in net erosion to the north and northeast that represents key underlying concepts, including tectonic (compression, rift-flank uplift, thermo-mechanical coupling, mantle dynamics, flexural/isostatic response) as well as magmatic and glacial processes. We have integrated pre-glacial and glacial net erosion using the mass balance method and added our results from sonic velocity, interval velocity and sandstone diagenesis methods to the new maps. This review shows that discrepancies of net erosion estimates from different methods are on the order of 500 m. Finally, we identify research gaps for future studies, with implications for the Barents Shelf and other uplifted basins worldwideen_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherElsevier Scienceen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleCenozoic uplift and erosion of the Norwegian Barents Shelf – A reviewen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.source.volume217en_US
dc.source.journalEarth-Science Reviewsen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.earscirev.2021.103609
dc.identifier.cristin1901527
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: 228107en_US
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: 223259en_US
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: 223272en_US
dc.description.localcodeThis is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons CC-BY license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.en_US
dc.source.articlenumber103609en_US
cristin.ispublishedfalse
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode2


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal