Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorHillier-Brown, Frances
dc.contributor.authorThomson, Katie
dc.contributor.authorMcgowan, Victoria
dc.contributor.authorCairns, Joanne
dc.contributor.authorEikemo, Terje Andreas
dc.contributor.authorGil-Gonzále, Diana
dc.contributor.authorBambra, Clare
dc.date.accessioned2020-05-14T13:22:26Z
dc.date.available2020-05-14T13:22:26Z
dc.date.created2019-06-25T13:01:25Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citationScandinavian Journal of Public Health. 2019, 1-11.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1403-4948
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2654507
dc.description.abstractBackground: The welfare state distributes financial resources to its citizens – protecting them in times of adversity. Variations in how such social protection policies are administered have been attributed to important differences in population health. The aim of this systematic review of reviews is to update and appraise the evidence base of the effects of social protection policies on health inequalities. Methods/design: Systematic review methodology was used. Nine databases were searched from 2007 to 2017 for reviews of social policy interventions in high-income countries. Quality was assessed using the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews 2 tool. Results: Six systematic reviews were included in our review, reporting 50 unique primary studies. Two reviews explored income maintenance and poverty relief policies and found some, low quality, evidence that increased unemployment benefit generosity may improve population mental health. Four reviews explored active labour-market policies and found some, low-quality evidence, that return to work initiatives may lead to short-term health improvements, but that in the longer term, they can lead to declines in mental health. The more rigorously conducted reviews found no significant health effects of any of social protection policy under investigation. No reviews of family policies were located. Conclusions: The systematic review evidence base of the effects of social protection policy interventions remains sparse, of low quality, of limited generalizability (as the evidence base is concentrated in the Anglo-Saxon welfare state type), and relatively inconclusive. There is a clear need for evaluations in more diverse welfare state settings and particularly of family policies.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherSAGE Publicationsen_US
dc.titleThe effects of social protection policies on health inequalities: Evidence from systematic reviewsen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.source.pagenumber1-11en_US
dc.source.journalScandinavian Journal of Public Healthen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/1403494819848276
dc.identifier.cristin1707561
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: 288638en_US
dc.description.localcodeThis article will not be available due to copyright restrictions (c) 2019 by SAGEen_US
cristin.unitcode194,67,25,0
cristin.unitnameInstitutt for sosiologi og statsvitenskap
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel