dc.contributor.author | Solberg, Klas | |
dc.contributor.author | Berto, Filippo | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-01-30T08:48:24Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-01-30T08:48:24Z | |
dc.date.created | 2019-06-17T14:29:29Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2019 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Material Design & Processing Communications. 2019, . | nb_NO |
dc.identifier.issn | 2577-6576 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11250/2638770 | |
dc.description.abstract | This brief communication gives an overview of fatigue behaviour and assessment of additively manufactured metals. The high cycle fatigue behaviour of as‐built and post‐processed additively manufactured superalloy 718, stainless steel (316L and 17‐4PH), and Ti‐6Al‐4 V is compared with their wrought counterparts. Further, different approaches used for assessment of the fatigue behaviour are presented. | nb_NO |
dc.language.iso | eng | nb_NO |
dc.publisher | Wiley | nb_NO |
dc.rights | Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal | * |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no | * |
dc.title | What is going on with fatigue of additively manufactured metals? | nb_NO |
dc.type | Journal article | nb_NO |
dc.type | Peer reviewed | |
dc.description.version | publishedVersion | nb_NO |
dc.source.pagenumber | 4 | nb_NO |
dc.source.journal | Material Design & Processing Communications | nb_NO |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.1002/mdp2.84 | |
dc.identifier.cristin | 1705397 | |
dc.description.localcode | © 2019 The Authors. Material Design & Processing Communications Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited | nb_NO |
cristin.unitcode | 194,64,92,0 | |
cristin.unitname | Institutt for maskinteknikk og produksjon | |
cristin.ispublished | true | |
cristin.fulltext | postprint | |