Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorAnyan, Frederick
dc.contributor.authorHjemdal, Odin
dc.contributor.authorBizumic, Boris
dc.contributor.authorFriborg, Oddgeir
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-20T13:19:52Z
dc.date.available2020-01-20T13:19:52Z
dc.date.created2019-04-05T13:42:26Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citationEuropean Journal of Psychological Assessment. 2019, 1-9.nb_NO
dc.identifier.issn1015-5759
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2637041
dc.description.abstractAbstract. Resilience has become increasingly important in clinical and health psychology, but only few scales have received good psychometric ratings for assessing various outcomes of resilience. The Resilience Scale for Adults (RSA) is one of the best psychometrically rated scales and has been validated among Norwegian samples. The purpose of this study was to explore the construct validity of the RSA in an English-speaking Australian sample and test measurement invariance between the Australian sample and a Norwegian sample. An Australian sample (N = 781) completed the RSA, Sense of Coherence Scale (SOC-13), Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), and Generalized Anxiety Disorder Questionnaire (GAD-7). A second sample of Norwegians (N = 320) was included in the analyses of invariance of the RSA across cultures. There were expected negative correlations between RSA and PHQ-9, and between RSA and GAD-7, but positive correlations between RSA and SOC-13. The results indicated that the six-factor measurement model of the RSA is the same in the Australian and Norwegian samples, and respondents from the two cultures understood and interpreted the items in a comparable fashion. Support was found for the cross-cultural validity of the RSA in an English-speaking Australian sample and as a valid and reliable self-report measure of protective factors.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.titleMeasuring Resilience Across Australia and Norway: Validation and Psychometric Properties of the English Version of the Resilience Scale for Adultsnb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer reviewednb_NO
dc.description.versionacceptedVersionnb_NO
dc.source.pagenumber1-9nb_NO
dc.source.journalEuropean Journal of Psychological Assessmentnb_NO
dc.identifier.doi10.1027/1015-5759/a000509
dc.identifier.cristin1690453
dc.description.localcode© 2019. This is the authors’ accepted and refereed manuscript to the article published by Hogrefenb_NO
cristin.unitcode194,67,40,0
cristin.unitnameInstitutt for psykologi
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextpreprint
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel