Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorHolm, Silje Elisabeth Hasmo
dc.contributor.authorHansen, Bjarne
dc.contributor.authorKvale, Gerd
dc.contributor.authorEilertsen, Thomas
dc.contributor.authorJohnsen, Bjørn Helge
dc.contributor.authorHystad, Sigurd William
dc.contributor.authorSolem, Stian
dc.date.accessioned2019-11-14T07:14:24Z
dc.date.available2019-11-14T07:14:24Z
dc.date.created2019-07-08T11:33:29Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citationScandinavian Journal of Psychology. 2019, 60 (3), 243-251.nb_NO
dc.identifier.issn0036-5564
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2628393
dc.description.abstractThere is a lack of research on the relation between obsessive‐compulsive disorder (OCD) and resilience. Dispositional resilience, as described and defined in literature on hardiness, consists of three facets, namely beliefs about having control in everyday living, having a sense of purpose or commitment, and a positive attitude toward challenges. This study explores associations between dispositional resilience (measured with the Dispositional Resilience Scale (DRS‐15‐R)), symptom severity, and treatment outcome in a sample of 89 patients treated with concentrated exposure therapy (cET), and compares the findings with scores from two reference groups (students and soldiers). The patient group had significantly lower resilience scores than the two reference groups. Weak correlations were observed between dispositional resilience and OCD symptoms. Differences in dispositional resilience were weakly related to remission status at follow‐up (odds ratio of 1.11). Furthermore, resilience improved from pre‐ to post‐treatment (Cohen's d of 0.65). Our results imply that patients’ initial resilience score does not hinder nor facilitate treatment effects to a great extent in this format of ERP treatment.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherWileynb_NO
dc.titleDispositional resilience in treatment‐seeking patients with obsessive‐compulsive disorder and its association with treatment outcomenb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer reviewednb_NO
dc.description.versionacceptedVersionnb_NO
dc.source.pagenumber243-251nb_NO
dc.source.volume60nb_NO
dc.source.journalScandinavian Journal of Psychologynb_NO
dc.source.issue3nb_NO
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/sjop.12531
dc.identifier.cristin1710609
dc.description.localcodeLocked until 6.3.2020 due to copyright restrictions. This is the peer reviewed version of an article, which has been published in final form at [https://doi.org/10.1111/sjop.12531]. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Self-Archiving.nb_NO
cristin.unitcode194,67,40,0
cristin.unitnameInstitutt for psykologi
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel