Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorNordahl, Henrik
dc.contributor.authorWells, Adrian
dc.date.accessioned2019-03-13T08:25:47Z
dc.date.available2019-03-13T08:25:47Z
dc.date.created2018-05-11T18:36:02Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.citationClinical Psychologist. 2018, .nb_NO
dc.identifier.issn1328-4207
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2589784
dc.description.abstractBackground Common mental disorders are associated with significant economic, social, and personal costs that are primarily incurred through loss of work status. Psychological interventions based on cognitive‐behavioural therapy have been implemented to enhance return to work (RTW), but have not proved sufficiently successful. According to the metacognitive model of psychological disorders, metacognitive beliefs are the key factors underlying self‐regulation and could therefore potentially be important for work status. The aim of the current study was therefore to investigate whether metacognitive beliefs could have predictive utility for work status. Method In a cross‐sectional design, 427 working age individuals reporting to be working (n = 292) or receiving disability benefits (n = 135) participated in the study. Results We found that metacognitive beliefs about the need for mental control were significant as predictors of work status over and above the presence of a diagnosed mental disorder and levels of trait anxiety. Conclusions These findings imply that metacognitive beliefs have predictive utility for work status even when controlling for mental health status, and that metacognitive beliefs might therefore be addressed in treatment to enhance RTW and with the aim of reducing long‐term sick leave.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherWileynb_NO
dc.titleIn or out of work: A preliminary investigation of mental health, trait anxiety and metacognitive beliefs as predictors of work statusnb_NO
dc.title.alternativeIn or out of work: A preliminary investigation of mental health, trait anxiety and metacognitive beliefs as predictors of work statusnb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer reviewednb_NO
dc.description.versionacceptedVersionnb_NO
dc.source.pagenumber6nb_NO
dc.source.journalClinical Psychologistnb_NO
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/cp.12153
dc.identifier.cristin1584654
dc.description.localcodeLocked until 9.5.2019 due to copyright restrictions. This is the peer reviewed version of an article, which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1111/cp.12153. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Self-Archiving.nb_NO
cristin.unitcode194,67,40,0
cristin.unitnameInstitutt for psykologi
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel