Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorFlaten, Magne
dc.contributor.authorBjørkedal, Espen
dc.contributor.authorLyby, Peter Solvoll
dc.contributor.authorFigenschau, Yngve Anton
dc.contributor.authorAslaksen, Per M
dc.date.accessioned2018-10-12T07:28:18Z
dc.date.available2018-10-12T07:28:18Z
dc.date.created2018-08-22T14:26:08Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.issn1664-1078
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2567748
dc.description.abstractBackground: Associative learning has, in several studies, been modulated by the sex of the participant. Consistent with this, a recent review found that conditioned nocebo effects are stronger in females than in males. Purpose: It has been suggested that conditioned placebo responses are stronger in females, and this hypothesis was investigated in the present study. Cortisol and measures of negative emotions were taken to investigate if these processes could mediate any conditioned placebo effects. Methods: Cold pain was applied to the volar forearm. The Conditioned group received inert capsules prior to two presentations of less painful stimulations, to associate intake of the capsules with reduced pain. The pain control group received the same painful stimulation as the Conditioned group, but no capsules. The Capsule control group received the capsules in the same way as the Conditioned group, but no decrease in the painful stimulation. Participant sex was crossed across groups. It was hypothesized that in the Conditioned group, an expectation of reduced pain should be induced after administration of the capsules, and this should generate placebo analgesia, and mostly so in females. Results: The Conditioned group reported lower pain during conditioning, and rated the capsules as more effective painkillers than the capsule control group. However, placebo analgesia was not reliably observed in the Conditioned group. Conclusion: The placebo capsules were rated as effective painkillers, but this did not translate into a placebo analgesic effect. This could be due to violation of response expectancies, too few conditioning trials, and differences in pain ratings in the pre-test that could be due to previous experience with painkillers.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherFrontiers Medianb_NO
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleFailure to Find a Conditioned Placebo Analgesic Responsenb_NO
dc.title.alternativeFailure to Find a Conditioned Placebo Analgesic Response.nb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer reviewednb_NO
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionnb_NO
dc.source.volume9nb_NO
dc.source.journalFrontiers in Psychologynb_NO
dc.source.issue1198nb_NO
dc.identifier.doi10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01198
dc.identifier.cristin1603830
dc.description.localcodeCopyright © 2018 Flaten, Bjørkedal, Lyby, Figenschau and Aslaksen. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY).nb_NO
cristin.unitcode194,67,40,0
cristin.unitnameInstitutt for psykologi
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode2


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal