Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorDarnhofer, Ika
dc.contributor.authorSchermer, Markus
dc.contributor.authorSteinbacher, Melanie
dc.contributor.authorGabillet, Marine
dc.contributor.authorDaugstad, Karoline
dc.date.accessioned2017-11-08T13:53:18Z
dc.date.available2017-11-08T13:53:18Z
dc.date.created2017-08-14T12:51:54Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.citationLand Use Policy. 2017, 68 306-315.nb_NO
dc.identifier.issn0264-8377
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2464994
dc.description.abstractTo protect grasslands and maintain the ecosystem services they provide, many European countries have been offering agri-environment measures aimed at maintaining extensive grazing by cattle, sheep or goats. Yet, despite more than two decades of agri-environment measures, semi-natural mountain pastures are still seen as threatened by abandonment and subsequent shrub encroachment. Building on a three-round Delphi inquiry, we analyse the perception of a range of experts on how measures aimed at maintaining mountain grasslands are designed and implemented in Austria, France and Norway. Results show that the experts see the need for a stronger involvement of diverse regional actors, the need to increase the flexibility given to farmers in managing mountain grasslands, and the need to reconceptualise monitoring as a social learning process. While these approaches are implemented in some ‘best practice’ examples, they are not widespread. Understanding these approaches as requiring double-loop learning may contribute to explaining their limited spread. Indeed, they build on a radically different conceptualization of farmers and of researchers, and thus of how agri-environment measures need to be designed and implemented to be effective. Yet, such radical changes are likely to be resisted.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherElseviernb_NO
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titlePreserving permanent mountain grasslands in Western Europe: Why are promising approaches not implemented more widely?nb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer reviewednb_NO
dc.description.versionacceptedVersionnb_NO
dc.source.pagenumber306-315nb_NO
dc.source.volume68nb_NO
dc.source.journalLand Use Policynb_NO
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.08.005
dc.identifier.cristin1486107
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: 225463nb_NO
dc.description.localcode© 2017. This is the authors’ accepted and refereed manuscript to the article. LOCKED until 12.8.2020 due to copyright restrictions. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/nb_NO
cristin.unitcode194,67,10,0
cristin.unitnameGeografisk institutt
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextpostprint
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal