Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorBerker, Thomas
dc.date.accessioned2017-11-01T09:17:02Z
dc.date.available2017-11-01T09:17:02Z
dc.date.created2010-08-13T11:49:04Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Innovation and Sustainable Development. 2010, 5 (1), 65-79.nb_NO
dc.identifier.issn1740-8822
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2463356
dc.description.abstractIn this paper, innovation is studied as a set of activities that seeks to deal with uncertainty. It is argued that the very idea of innovation contains the assumption that the future is, in principle, open to change. Moreover, since innovations compete with other innovations and with existing solutions as well, the outcome of innovative activities has to remain uncertain. Innovation theories, in the course of their development away from the linear models, have introduced elements that allow for certain degrees of fuzziness, randomness, and circularity. However, if the concern for impacts of an innovation is introduced into innovation theory, even more uncertainty is generated. This is, for instance, the case in sustainable innovations. Therefore, a fundamental shift in the thinking around innovation was promoted toward open-endedness and reflexivity. After a discussion of these conceptual efforts to incorporate uncertainty, the innovative actors' own strategies are studied in two empirical cases: advanced daylight systems and technologies that use CO2 as working fluid for heating and cooling. These cases employ two different strategies to overcome uncertainty – mainstreaming and substitution – which are discussed in the light of innovation models in the last section.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherIndersciencenb_NO
dc.titleDealing with uncertainty in sustainable innovation: mainstreaming and substitutionnb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer reviewednb_NO
dc.description.versionacceptedVersionnb_NO
dc.source.pagenumber65-79nb_NO
dc.source.volume5nb_NO
dc.source.journalInternational Journal of Innovation and Sustainable Developmentnb_NO
dc.source.issue1nb_NO
dc.identifier.doi10.1504/IJISD.2010.034558
dc.identifier.cristin349432
dc.relation.projectEgen institusjon: 11nb_NO
dc.description.localcode© 2010 Inderscience Enterprises Ltd. This is the authors' accepted and refereed manuscript to the article.nb_NO
cristin.unitcode194,62,40,0
cristin.unitnameInstitutt for tverrfaglige kulturstudier
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextpostprint
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel