Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorSkjølsvold, Tomas Moe
dc.date.accessioned2017-10-10T08:20:34Z
dc.date.available2017-10-10T08:20:34Z
dc.date.created2013-06-05T15:19:59Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier.citationSociety & Natural Resources. 2013, 26 (11), 1268-1282.nb_NO
dc.identifier.issn0894-1920
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2459342
dc.description.abstractCriteria for sustainability are frequently contested and changed based on competing or new types of knowledge. This is a potential problem for policy and decision makers struggling to come up with policies regarding environmental threats and pondering which technologies to promote and which to avoid, and when dealing with past choices made on different or false knowledge claims. Such questions may be incentives for status quo, as making mistakes might cause public contempt for politicians and experts. Complex issues like environmental impacts cannot be expected to be managed through criteria without controversy and change. Understanding the dynamics of such controversies is important to be able to cope with them. In this article I propose an analytical approach based on the notion of “framing” intended to contribute toward this goal. Empirically the approach builds upon the study of two controversies about the sustainability of energy sources: one about peat, the other about bioenergy.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherTaylor & Francisnb_NO
dc.titleWhat We Disagree about When We Disagree about Sustainabilitynb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer reviewednb_NO
dc.description.versionacceptedVersionnb_NO
dc.source.pagenumber1268-1282nb_NO
dc.source.volume26nb_NO
dc.source.journalSociety & Natural Resourcesnb_NO
dc.source.issue11nb_NO
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/08941920.2013.797527
dc.identifier.cristin1032628
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: 185397nb_NO
dc.relation.projectEgen institusjon: 11nb_NO
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: 209697nb_NO
dc.description.localcodeThis is an accepted manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Society and Natural Resources on 18 Jul 2013, available at http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/08941920.2013.797527nb_NO
cristin.unitcode194,62,40,0
cristin.unitnameInstitutt for tverrfaglige kulturstudier
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextpostprint
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel