Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.advisorSkogestad, Sigurd
dc.contributor.advisorNekså, Petter
dc.contributor.authorLúa, Adriana Reyes
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-09T13:52:40Z
dc.date.available2020-03-09T13:52:40Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.isbn978-82-326-4495-7
dc.identifier.issn1503-8181
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2646065
dc.description.abstractPID-based advanced control structures are commonly used in process industries. However, their design mostly relies on the experience of the control and process engineers, and not always considers optimal operation. This thesis introduces a framework for the design of PID-based control structures, also considering steady-state optimal operation. In the proposed procedure, we use a priority list of constraints to make operation feasible. We also identify the relevant active constraint switches in the supervisory layer and how to handle each case. The active constraints can be on manipulated variables (MV, input) or on controlled variables (CV, output), and the switching cases are: •CV to CV constraint switching: use selectors. •MV to MV constraint switching: use split range control or alternatively controllers with different setpoints or input (valve) position control. •MV to CV constraint switching: use nothing if the input saturation pairing rule is followed; otherwise, use an MV to MV scheme and a selector to take over control when the main MV saturates. Control structures that extend the operating range for the controlled variable by using more than one manipulated variable are of interest because they can handle MV to MV constraint switching and MV to CV constraint switching. This thesis gives a closer look to standard split range control and proposes a systematic design procedure for this control structure, considering the different dynamic effects of each MV on the CV. Standard split range control has intrinsic limitations in terms of tuning because it only has one common controller and one design parameter for each MV. To overcome this, we propose a generalized split range controller that uses a baton strategy to allow using independent controllers for each MV and the same setpoint. However, sometimes it is optimal to have different setpoints, and in this thesis we identify in which cases it is optimal to use different controllers with different setpoints and describe a procedure to find the optimal setpoint deviations. The thesis contains several cases demonstrating various classical control structures for supervisory control and it also gives some brief guidelines when to use classical control schemes and when to use Model Predictive Control (MPC).nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherNTNUnb_NO
dc.relation.ispartofseriesDoctoral theses at NTNU;2020:71
dc.relation.haspartReyes-Lúa, Adriana; Skogestad, Sigurd. Systematic Design of Active Constraint Switching Using Classical Advanced Control Structures. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 2019 ;Volum 56.(6) s. 2229-2241 https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.9b04511
dc.relation.haspartReyes-Lúa, A., Andreasen, G., Larsen, L. F. S., Stoustrup, J., and Skogestad, S. (2019a). Optimal operation of a CO2- refrigeration system with heat recovery. In Proceedings of the 29th European Symposium on Computer Aided Process Engineering (ESCAPE), Eindhoven, Netherlands. Computer-aided chemical engineering
dc.relation.haspartReyes-Lúa, A., Zotica, C., and Skogestad, S. Optimal Operation with Changing Active Constraint Regions using Classical Advanced Control. In 10th IFAC Symposium on Advanced Control of Chemical Processes (ADCHEM), Shenyang, China. IFAC-Papers OnLine 2018 ;Volum 51.(18) s. 440-445 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2018.09.340
dc.relation.haspartReyes-Lúa, A., Zotica, C., Das, T., Krishnamoorthy, D., and Skogestad, S. (2018b). Changing between Active Constraint Regions for Optimal Operation: Classical Advanced Control versus Model Predictive Control. In Proceedings of the 28th European Symposium on Computer Aided Process Engineering (ESCAPE), Graz, Austria. Computer-aided chemical engineering
dc.relation.haspartReyes-Lúa, Adriana; Zotica, Cristina Florina; Forsman, Leif Krister; Skogestad, Sigurd. Systematic Design of Split Range Controllers. IFAC-PapersOnLine 2019 ;Volum 52.(1) s. 898-903 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2019.06.176
dc.relation.haspartReyes-Lúa, A. and Skogestad, S. (2019a). Multi-input single-output control for extending the operating range: Generalized split range control using the baton strategy. Journal of Process Control (Under review)
dc.relation.haspartReyes Lua, Adriana; Backi, Christoph Josef; Skogestad, Sigurd. Improved PI control for a surge tank satisfying level constraints. IFAC-PapersOnLine 2018 ;Volum 51.(4) s. 835-840 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2018.06.125
dc.relation.haspartReyes-Lúa, Adriana; Skogestad, Sigurd. Multiple-Input Single-Output Control for Extending the Steady-State Operating Range—Use of Controllers with Different Setpoints. Processes 2019 ;Volum 7.(12) https://doi.org/10.3390/pr7120941 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0)
dc.titleSystematic design of advanced control structuresnb_NO
dc.typeDoctoral thesisnb_NO
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Technology: 500::Chemical engineering: 560nb_NO


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel