Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBye, Asta
dc.contributor.authorBjerkeset, Ellen
dc.contributor.authorStensheim, Hanne
dc.contributor.authorLoge, Jon Håvard
dc.contributor.authorHjermstad, Marianne Jensen
dc.contributor.authorKlepstad, Pål
dc.contributor.authorHabberstad, Ragnhild H
dc.contributor.authorKaasa, Stein
dc.contributor.authorAass, Nina Kathrine
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-09T10:08:35Z
dc.date.available2023-01-09T10:08:35Z
dc.date.created2022-11-29T13:36:08Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationPalliative Medicine Reports (PMR). 2022, 3 (1), .en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3041867
dc.description.abstractBackground: Patients with advanced cancer and bone metastases may have unmet palliative care (PC) needs that go unnoticed during clinical oncological practice. This observational study describes interventions that were initiated as the patients participated in the Palliative Radiotherapy and Inflammation Study (PRAIS). It was hypothesized that the patients would benefit from study participation due to PC interventions initiated by the study team. Methods: A retrospective review of patients' electronic records. Patients with advanced cancer and painful bone metastases included in PRAIS were eligible. All patients met with the study team before start of radiotherapy, after completion of Patient Reported Outcome Measures. Interventions initiated by the study team were documented in the patients' electronic records. Results: A total of 133 patients were reviewed: 63% males, mean (standard deviation [SD]) age 65 (9.6) and mean (SD) Karnofsky performance status (KPS) score 73.2 (9.1). Interventions were initiated in 50% (n = 67) of the patients. Changes in opioid management (69%), treatment of constipation (43%), and nausea (24%) and nutritional advice were most frequent (21%). Patients receiving interventions had lower mean KPS (70 vs. 77 p < 0.001), shorter survival time after study inclusion (median 28 vs. 57.5 weeks p = 0.005) and were more often opioid naïve (12% vs. 39% p < 0.001) than those not receiving interventions by the study team. Conclusions: Patients with advanced cancer and painful bone metastasis benefited from study participation due to multiple PC interventions initiated by the study team. The findings call for a systematic integration of PC in patients with advanced cancer.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMary Ann Lieberten_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleBenefits of Study Participation for Patients with Advanced Cancer Receiving Radiotherapy: A Prospective Observational Studyen_US
dc.title.alternativeBenefits of Study Participation for Patients with Advanced Cancer Receiving Radiotherapy: A Prospective Observational Studyen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.source.pagenumber8en_US
dc.source.volume3en_US
dc.source.journalPalliative Medicine Reports (PMR)en_US
dc.source.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1089/pmr.2022.0044
dc.identifier.cristin2084070
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal