Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorTrondrud, Liv Monica
dc.contributor.authorUgland, Cassandra Regine
dc.contributor.authorRopstad, Erik
dc.contributor.authorLoe, Leif Egil
dc.contributor.authorAlbon, Steve
dc.contributor.authorStien, Audun
dc.contributor.authorEvans, Alina
dc.contributor.authorThorsby, Per Medbøe
dc.contributor.authorVeiberg, Vebjørn
dc.contributor.authorIrvine, R. Justin
dc.contributor.authorPigeon, Gabriel
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-18T07:21:29Z
dc.date.available2022-11-18T07:21:29Z
dc.date.created2022-11-02T12:58:50Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationScientific Reports. 2022, 12 , .en_US
dc.identifier.issn2045-2322
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3032677
dc.description.abstractWhile capture-mark-recapture studies provide essential individual-level data in ecology, repeated captures and handling may impact animal welfare and cause scientific bias. Evaluating the consequences of invasive methodologies should be an integral part of any study involving capture of live animals. We investigated short- and long-term stress responses to repeated captures within a winter on the physiology, behaviour, and reproductive success of female Svalbard reindeer (Rangifer tarandus platyrhynchus). Short-term responses were evaluated using serum concentrations of glucocorticoids and catecholamines during handling, and post-release recovery times in heart rate and activity levels. Repeated captures were associated with an increase in measured catecholamines and glucocorticoids, except cortisone, and delayed recovery in heart rate but not activity. Four months later, in summer, individuals captured repeatedly in winter exhibited a small increase in behavioural response to human disturbance and had a lower probability of being observed with a calf, compared to animals not captured, or captured only once. Our findings imply that single annual capture events have no significant negative consequences for Svalbard reindeer, but repeated captures within a season may impact offspring survival in the same year. Such unanticipated side effects highlight the importance of addressing multiple indicators of animal responses to repeated captures.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherSpringer Natureen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleStress responses to repeated captures in a wild ungulateen_US
dc.title.alternativeStress responses to repeated captures in a wild ungulateen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.source.pagenumber15en_US
dc.source.volume12en_US
dc.source.journalScientific Reportsen_US
dc.source.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1038/s41598-022-20270-z
dc.identifier.cristin2067987
dc.source.articlenumber16289en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal