Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBergsli, Lykke Øverland
dc.contributor.authorLind, Andrea Falk
dc.contributor.authorMolnar, Peter
dc.contributor.authorPolasik, Michal
dc.date.accessioned2022-07-07T08:38:24Z
dc.date.available2022-07-07T08:38:24Z
dc.date.created2022-02-22T12:20:03Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.issn0275-5319
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3003405
dc.description.abstractSince Bitcoin price is highly volatile, forecasting its volatility is crucial for many applications, such as risk management or hedging. We study which model is the most suitable for forecasting Bitcoin volatility. We consider several GARCH and two heterogeneous autoregressive (HAR) models and compare them. Since we utilize realized variance estimated from high frequency data as a proxy for true volatility, we can draw sharper conclusions than studies which use only daily data. We find that EGARCH and APARCH perform best among the GARCH models. HAR models based on realized variance perform better than GARCH models based on daily data. Superiority of HAR models over GARCH models is strongest for short-term volatility forecasts.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleForecasting volatility of Bitcoinen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.source.volume59en_US
dc.source.journalResearch In International Business and Financeen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ribaf.2021.101540
dc.identifier.cristin2004469
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal