Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSkeie, Guri
dc.contributor.authorMode, Nicolle
dc.contributor.authorHenningsen, Maria
dc.contributor.authorBorch, Kristin Benjaminsen
dc.date.accessioned2015-07-27T09:44:08Z
dc.date.accessioned2015-09-02T11:07:36Z
dc.date.available2015-07-27T09:44:08Z
dc.date.available2015-09-02T11:07:36Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.citationClinical Epidemiology 2015:313-323nb_NO
dc.identifier.issn1179-1349
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/298464
dc.description.abstractBackground: Body mass index (BMI) based on self-reported height and weight has been criticized as being biased because of an observed tendency for overweight and obese people to overestimate height and underestimate weight, resulting in higher misclassification for these groups. We examined the validity of BMI based on self-reported values in a sample of Norwegian women aged 44–64 years. Methods: The study sample of 1,837 participants in the Norwegian Women and Cancer study self-reported height and weight, and then, within 1 year, either self-reported anthropometric again, or were measured by medical staff. Demographic and anthropometric were compared using t-tests and chi-square tests of independence. Misclassification of BMI categories was assessed by weighted Cohen’s kappa and Bland–Altman plot. Results: On average, the two measurements were taken 8 months apart, and self-reported weight increased by 0.6 kg (P,0.05), and BMI by 0.2 kg/m2 (P,0.05). The distribution of BMI categories did not differ between self-reported and measured values. There was substantial agreement between self-reported values and those measured by medical staff (weighted kappa 0.73). Under-reporting resulting in misclassification of BMI category was most common among overweight women (36%), but the highest proportion of extreme under-reporting was found in obese women (18% outside the 95% limits of agreement). The cumulative distribution curves for the measured and self-reported values closely followed each other, but measurements by medical staff were shifted slightly toward higher BMI values. Conclusion: While there was substantial agreement between self-reported and measured BMI values, there was small but statistically significant under-reporting of weight and thus self-reported BMI. The tendency to under-report was largest among overweight women, while the largest degree of under-reporting was found in the obese group. Self-reported weight and height provide a valid ranking of BMI for middle-aged Norwegian women. Keywords: body mass index, Norway, repeated measurements, self-report, validity, womennb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherDove Medical Pressnb_NO
dc.titleValidity of self-reported body mass index among middle-aged participants in the Norwegian Women and Cancer studynb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer revieweden_GB
dc.date.updated2015-07-27T09:44:08Z
dc.source.pagenumber313-323nb_NO
dc.source.journalClinical Epidemiologynb_NO
dc.identifier.doi10.2147/CLEP.S83839
dc.identifier.cristin1255208
dc.description.localcode© 2015 Skeie et al. This work is published by Dove Medical Press Limited, and licensed under Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. The full terms of the License are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. Permissions beyond the scope of the License are administered by Dove Medical Press Limited. Information on how to request permission may be found at: http://www.dovepress.com/permissions.phpnb_NO


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record