Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorCarrus, Giuseppe
dc.contributor.authorTiberio, Lorenza
dc.contributor.authorMastandrea, Stefano
dc.contributor.authorChokrai, Parissa
dc.contributor.authorFritsche, Immo
dc.contributor.authorKløckner, Christian
dc.contributor.authorMasson, Torsten
dc.contributor.authorVesely, Stepan
dc.contributor.authorPanno, Angelo
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-28T08:47:08Z
dc.date.available2022-02-28T08:47:08Z
dc.date.created2021-12-14T12:10:35Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationFrontiers in Psychology. 2021, 12 .en_US
dc.identifier.issn1664-1078
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2981604
dc.description.abstractUnderstanding how psychological processes drive human energy choices is an urgent, and yet relatively under-investigated, need for contemporary society. A knowledge gap still persists on the links between psychological factors identified in earlier studies and people's behaviors in the energy domain. This research applies a meta-analytical procedure to assess the strength of the associations between five different classes of individual variables (i.e.,: attitudes, intentions, values, awareness, and emotions) and energy-saving behavioral intentions and behaviors (self-reported and actual). Based on a systematic review of studies published between 2007 and 2017, we estimate the average effect size of predictor-criterion relations, and we assess relevant moderators and publication bias, drawing on data obtained from 102 independent samples reported in 67 published studies (N = 59.948). Results from a series of five single meta-analyses reveal a pattern of significant positive associations between the selected psychological determinants and energy-saving indicators: associations between individual-level predictors and energy-saving outcomes are positive and moderate in size, ranging from large effects for emotions to small-moderate effects for pro-environmental values. Interestingly, moderation analysis reveals, among other things, that attitude-behavior links are not statistically significant when actual behavior is considered as an outcome. Implications for policy interventions are discussed.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherFrontiers Mediaen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titlePsychological Predictors of Energy Saving Behavior: A Meta-Analytic Approachen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.source.pagenumber18en_US
dc.source.volume12en_US
dc.source.journalFrontiers in Psychologyen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3389/fpsyg.2021.648221
dc.identifier.cristin1968321
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal