Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHeltne, Aleksander
dc.contributor.authorBode, Christina
dc.contributor.authorHummelen, Benjamin
dc.contributor.authorFalkum, Erik
dc.contributor.authorSelvik, Sara Germans
dc.contributor.authorPaap, Muirne C. S.
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-02T10:07:57Z
dc.date.available2022-02-02T10:07:57Z
dc.date.created2021-10-01T09:02:41Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Personality Assessment. 2021, 1-15.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0022-3891
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2976612
dc.description.abstractThe DSM-5 presents two competing diagnostic frameworks for personality disorders: the standard categorical model and the Alternative Model of Personality Disorders (AMPD). The AMPD was initially criticized for being too complex and theory laden for clinical implementation. Though inter-rater reliability studies have contested initial claims of the model’s complexity, little attention has been paid to how clinicians experience the usability and learnability of either model. We interviewed twenty Norwegian clinicians about their experiences with either the SCID-II/5-PD (n = 9), SCID-5-AMPD-I (n = 8), or both (n = 3). Separate thematic analyses were conducted for SCID-II/5-PD and SCID-5-AMPD-I groups, and group themes were compared. We identified four themes for each group, relating to required skills, training, challenges and information gained through the interview. We found that training and clinical experience were considered to be important for both interviews. Moreover, the SCID-5-AMPD-I was considered to rely more explicitly on theory specific to the development and content of the AMPD model in general and the LPFS specifically We also identified shared and unique challenges and shortcomings of each interview. We comment on how our findings relate to the debate surrounding the AMPD, and recommend development of clear training guidelines for both interviews.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherTaylor & Francisen_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleNorwegian Clinicians’ Experiences of Learnability and Usability of SCID-II, SCID-5-PD and SCID-5-AMPD-I Interviews: A Sequential Multi-Group Qualitative Approachen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.source.pagenumber1-15en_US
dc.source.journalJournal of Personality Assessmenten_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/00223891.2021.1975726
dc.identifier.cristin1941851
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: 286893en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal