Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorModiri, Sadegh
dc.contributor.authorHeinkelmann, Robert
dc.contributor.authorBelda, Santiago
dc.contributor.authorMalkin, Zinovy
dc.contributor.authorHoseini, Mostafa
dc.contributor.authorKorte, Monika
dc.contributor.authorFerrándiz, José M.
dc.contributor.authorSchuh, Harald
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-19T12:32:51Z
dc.date.available2022-01-19T12:32:51Z
dc.date.created2021-11-23T14:35:51Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationSensors. 2021, 21 (22), .en_US
dc.identifier.issn1424-8220
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2838255
dc.description.abstractThe understanding of forced temporal variations in celestial pole motion (CPM) could bring us significantly closer to meeting the accuracy goals pursued by the Global Geodetic Observing System (GGOS) of the International Association of Geodesy (IAG), i.e., 1 mm accuracy and 0.1 mm/year stability on global scales in terms of the Earth orientation parameters. Besides astronomical forcing, CPM excitation depends on the processes in the fluid core and the core–mantle boundary. The same processes are responsible for the variations in the geomagnetic field (GMF). Several investigations were conducted during the last decade to find a possible interconnection of GMF changes with the length of day (LOD) variations. However, less attention was paid to the interdependence of the GMF changes and the CPM variations. This study uses the celestial pole offsets (CPO) time series obtained from very long baseline interferometry (VLBI) observations and data such as spherical harmonic coefficients, geomagnetic jerk, and magnetic field dipole moment from a state-of-the-art geomagnetic field model to explore the correlation between them. In this study, we use wavelet coherence analysis to compute the correspondence between the two non-stationary time series in the time–frequency domain. Our preliminary results reveal interesting common features in the CPM and GMF variations, which show the potential to improve the understanding of the GMF’s contribution to the Earth’s rotation. Special attention is given to the corresponding signal between FCN and GMF and potential time lags between geomagnetic jerks and rotational variations.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMDPIen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleTowards understanding the interconnection between celestial pole motion and earth’s magnetic field using space geodetic techniquesen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.source.pagenumber15en_US
dc.source.volume21en_US
dc.source.journalSensorsen_US
dc.source.issue22en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/s21227555
dc.identifier.cristin1957904
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal