Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorWahl, Sissel Gyrid Freim
dc.contributor.authorHong, Yan Dai
dc.contributor.authorEmdal, Elisabeth Fritzke
dc.contributor.authorBerg, Thomas
dc.contributor.authorHalvorsen, Tarje Onsøien
dc.contributor.authorOttestad, Anine Larsen
dc.contributor.authorLund-Iversen, Marius
dc.contributor.authorBrustugun, Odd
dc.contributor.authorFørde, Dagny
dc.contributor.authorPaulsen, Erna-Elise
dc.contributor.authorDonnem, Tom
dc.contributor.authorAndersen, Sigve
dc.contributor.authorGrønberg, Bjørn Henning
dc.contributor.authorRichardsen, Elin
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-28T07:30:51Z
dc.date.available2021-09-28T07:30:51Z
dc.date.created2021-09-13T09:36:07Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationCancers. 2021, 13 (17), 1-19.en_US
dc.identifier.issn2072-6694
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2783914
dc.description.abstractBackground: due to emerging therapeutics targeting KRAS G12C and previous reports with conflicting results regarding the prognostic impact of KRAS and KRAS G12C in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), we aimed to investigate the frequency of KRAS mutations and their associations with clinical characteristics and outcome. Since mutation subtypes have different preferences for downstream pathways, we also aimed to investigate whether there were differences in outcome according to mutation preference for the Raf, PI3K/Akt, or RalGDS/Ral pathways. Methods: retrospectively, clinicopathological data from 1233 stage I–IV non-squamous NSCLC patients with known KRAS status were reviewed. KRAS’ associations with clinical characteristics were analysed. Progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed for the following groups: KRAS wild type (wt) versus mutated, KRAS wt versus KRAS G12C versus KRAS non-G12C, among KRAS mutation subtypes and among mutation subtypes grouped according to preference for downstream pathways. Results: a total of 1117 patients were included; 38% had KRAS mutated tumours, 17% had G12C. Among KRAS mutated, G12C was the most frequent mutation in former/current smokers (45%) and G12D in never smokers (46%). There were no significant differences in survival according to KRAS status, G12C status, among KRAS mutation subtypes or mutation preference for downstream pathways. Conclusion: KRAS status or KRAS mutation subtype did not have any significant influence on PFS or OS.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMDPIen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleThe prognostic effect of KRAS mutations in non-small cell lung carcinoma revisited: A norwegian multicentre studyen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.source.pagenumber1-19en_US
dc.source.volume13en_US
dc.source.journalCancersen_US
dc.source.issue17en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/cancers13174294
dc.identifier.cristin1933602
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal