Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorFarina, Egidio
dc.contributor.authorGreen, Colin
dc.contributor.authorMcVicar, Duncan
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-23T06:18:13Z
dc.date.available2021-09-23T06:18:13Z
dc.date.created2021-05-21T14:09:18Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationIndustrial Relations. 2021, 60 (3), 370-399.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0019-8676
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2780599
dc.description.abstractEvidence suggests that non-standard jobs are associated with wage penalties. Yet, these jobs possess a range of undesirable characteristics that should generate compensating wage differentials. This evidence relies on derived wage variables, prone to measurement error likely to be correlated with employment contract. Stated-rate hourly wage questions are not subjected to the same measurement issues. Using zero-hour contracts in the UK, we show that there is no conditional average ZHC wage penalty once stated-rate hourly wage measures are used. We discuss implications for policy.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals Inc.en_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleAre Estimates of Non-Standard Employment Wage Penalties Robust to Different Wage Measures? The Case of Zero-hour Contracts in the UKen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.source.pagenumber370-399en_US
dc.source.volume60en_US
dc.source.journalIndustrial Relationsen_US
dc.source.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/irel.12284
dc.identifier.cristin1911322
dc.relation.projectAndre: Leverhulme Trust Research Project Grant RPG-2017-314en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal