| dc.description.abstract | The thesis introduces the reader to the discourse on the authenticity of some of
Newgrange’s reconstructed features and proposes to analyze it using Actor-Network
Theory, specifically taking inspiration from a paper by Callon (1986) - "Some Elements
of a Sociology of Translation: Domestication of the Scallops and the Fishermen of St
Brieuc Bay".
Authenticity is established as the central theme of the discourse, but three main points
of contention are established by the author by reviewing the recently published material
on the subject. The three points are the quartzite revetment wall, the solar alignment
phenomenon, and the significance of the site outside the Neolithic context being shown
to visitors now.
The analysis finds that there are two alliances vying for access to the monument. The
alliance led by The Office of Public Works Ireland has successfully undergone the four
moments of translation and have established themselves as The Obligatory Passage-
Point. The researchers trying to challenge the authenticity of Newgrange have a more
tenuous alliance, actively trying to involve other actors in their cause, such as The Irish
Public.
The thesis concludes that the status quo of the situation will likely remain unchanged,
unless internal dissidence occurs from within The Obligatory-Passage Point, or other
actors are enrolled, causing a shift of power. The thesis also finds it highly unlikely that
UNESCO will interfere directly in the matters of The Republic of Ireland, as per the Nara
document on authenticity. | |
