Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHetland, Magnus Lie
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-01T06:41:01Z
dc.date.available2021-09-01T06:41:01Z
dc.date.created2020-10-31T09:47:31Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.isbn978-3-030-60935-1
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2772064
dc.description.abstractIn metric search, worst-case analysis is of little value, as the search invariably degenerates to a linear scan for ill-behaved data. Consequently, much effort has been expended on more nuanced descriptions of what performance might in fact be attainable, including heuristic baselines like the AESA family, as well as statistical proxies such as intrinsic dimensionality. This paper gets to the heart of the matter with an exact characterization of the best performance actually achievable for any given data set and query. Specifically, linear-time objective-preserving reductions are established in both directions between optimal metric search and the minimum dominating set problem, whose greedy approximation becomes the equivalent of an oracle-based AESA, repeatedly selecting the pivot that eliminates the most of the remaining points. As an illustration, the AESA heuristic is adapted to downplay the role of previously eliminated points, yielding some modest performance improvements over the original, as well as its younger relative iAESA2.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.relation.ispartofProceedings of the 13th International Conference on Similarity Search and Applications
dc.titleOptimal Metric Search Is Equivalent to the Minimum Dominating Set Problemen_US
dc.typeChapteren_US
dc.description.versionacceptedVersionen_US
dc.identifier.cristin1843770
dc.description.localcode"This is a post-peer-review, pre-copyedit version of an article.en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextpreprint
cristin.qualitycode1


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record