Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorNyanchoka, Linda
dc.contributor.authorTudur-Smith, Catrin
dc.contributor.authorThu, Van Nguyen
dc.contributor.authorIversen, Valentina Cabral
dc.contributor.authorTricco, Andrea C.
dc.contributor.authorPorcher, Raphaël
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-27T08:24:29Z
dc.date.available2021-04-27T08:24:29Z
dc.date.created2019-06-12T12:54:46Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2019, 109, 99-110.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0895-4356
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2739811
dc.description.abstractBackground and Objectives Different methods to examine research gaps have been described, but there are still no standard methods for identifying, prioritizing, or reporting research gaps. This study aimed to describe the methods used to identify, prioritize, and display gaps in health research. Methods A scoping review using the Arksey and O'Malley methodological framework was carried out. We included all study types describing or reporting on methods to identify, prioritize, and display gaps or priorities in health research. Data synthesis is both quantitative and qualitative. Results Among 1,938 identified documents, 139 articles were selected for analysis; 90 (65%) aimed to identify gaps, 23 (17%) aimed to determine research priorities, and 26 (19%) had both aims. The most frequent methods in the review were aimed at gap identification and involved secondary research, which included knowledge synthesis (80/116 articles, 69%), specifically systematic reviews and scoping reviews (58/80, 73%). Among 49 studies aimed at research prioritization, the most frequent methods were both primary and secondary research, accounting for 24 (49%) reports. Finally, 52 (37%) articles described methods for displaying gaps and/or priorities in health research. Conclusion This study provides a mapping of different methods used to identify, prioritize, and display gaps or priorities in health research.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherElsevier Ltd.en_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleA scoping review describes methods used to identify, prioritize and display gaps in health researchen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.source.pagenumber99-110en_US
dc.source.volume109en_US
dc.source.journalJournal of Clinical Epidemiologyen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.01.005
dc.identifier.cristin1704324
dc.description.localcodeThis article is available under the Creative Commons CC-BY-NC-ND license and permits non-commercial use of the work as published, without adaptation or alteration provided the work is fully attributed.en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode2


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal