Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorAndersen, Vidar
dc.contributor.authorPedersen, Helene
dc.contributor.authorFimland, Marius Steiro
dc.contributor.authorShaw, Matthew Peter
dc.contributor.authorSolstad, Tom Erik Jorung
dc.contributor.authorStien, Nicolay
dc.contributor.authorCumming, Kristoffer Toldnes
dc.contributor.authorSæterbakken, Atle Hole
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-20T10:14:55Z
dc.date.available2021-04-20T10:14:55Z
dc.date.created2021-04-15T09:11:47Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Sports Science and Medicine. 2021, 20 181-186.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1303-2968
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2738600
dc.description.abstractThe aim of the study was to compare neuromuscular activation in the gluteus maximus, the biceps femoris and the erector spinae from the Romanian deadlift, the 45-degree Roman chair back extension and the seated machine back extension. Fifteen resistance-trained females performed three repetitions with 6-RM loading in all exercises in a randomized and counterbalanced order. The activation in the whole movement as well as its lower and upper parts were analyzed. The results showed that the Romanian deadlift and the Roman chair back extension activated the gluteus maximus more than the seated machine back extension (94-140%, p < 0.01). For the biceps femoris the Roman chair elicited higher activation compared to both the Romanian deadlift and the seated machine back extension (71-174%). Further, the Romanian deadlift activated the biceps femoris more compared to the seated machine back extension (61%, p < 0.01). The analyses of the different parts of the movement showed that the Roman chair produced higher levels of activation in the upper part for both the gluteus maximus and the biceps femoris, compared to the other exercises. There were no differences in activation of the erector spinae between the three exercises (p = 1.00). In conclusion, both the Roman deadlift and the Roman chair back extension would be preferable to the seated machine back extension in regards to gluteus maximus activation. The Roman chair was superior in activating the biceps femoris compared to the two other exercises. All three exercises are appropriate selections for activating the lower back muscles. For overall lower limb activation, the Roman chair was the best exercise.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherDepartment of Sports Medicine, Uludag Universityen_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleComparison of Muscle Activity in Three Single-Joint, Hip Extension Exercises in Resistance-Trained Womenen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.source.pagenumber181-186en_US
dc.source.volume20en_US
dc.source.journalJournal of Sports Science and Medicineen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.52082/jssm.2021.181
dc.identifier.cristin1904208
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal