Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorMunkebye, Eli
dc.contributor.authorScheie, Eldri
dc.contributor.authorGabrielsen, Anja
dc.contributor.authorJordet, Arne N. Nikolaisen
dc.contributor.authorMisund, Stig
dc.contributor.authorNergård, Tone
dc.contributor.authorØyehaug, Anne Bergliot
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-30T08:45:52Z
dc.date.available2021-03-30T08:45:52Z
dc.date.created2020-04-30T11:42:36Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationEnvironmental Education Research. 2020, 26 (6), 795-811.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1350-4622
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2736072
dc.description.abstractEducation for sustainable development (ESD) provides crucial opportunities for young people to be involved in complex sustainability issues. This study contributes to existing knowledge about primary school teachers’ approaches to ESD across a range of subjects. Norwegian schools can join the Sustainable Backpack programme (SBP), which supports teachers to develop projects that promote a holistic understanding of sustainable development across school subjects. The present study set out to examines teachers’ interdisciplinary approach to ESD and the SBP teachers’ perceptions of how their curriculum units promote environmental, social and economic dimensions of sustainable development. The study is a multi-case study, with curriculum units designed for students aged 10-13 years from 14 Norwegian schools. Content analysis suggest that the units used several subjects to ESD, but the teachers could have challenged the students’ reflection to a greater extent in terms of argumentation and critical thinking. The units succeeded to some extent in pursuing a holistic approach.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherTaylor & Francis Groupen_US
dc.titleInterdisciplinary primary school curriculum units for sustainable developmenten_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionacceptedVersionen_US
dc.source.pagenumber795-811en_US
dc.source.volume26en_US
dc.source.journalEnvironmental Education Researchen_US
dc.source.issue6en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/13504622.2020.1750568
dc.identifier.cristin1808818
dc.description.localcodeLocked until 22 October 2021 due to copyright restrictions. This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis, available at https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2020.1750568en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextpreprint
cristin.fulltextpostprint
cristin.qualitycode2


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel