Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorLevy, Gabriel
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-18T08:15:52Z
dc.date.available2021-03-18T08:15:52Z
dc.date.created2020-08-06T15:21:02Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationMethod & Theory in the Study of Religion. 2020, 32 259-266.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0943-3058
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2734048
dc.description.abstractAs I understand it, the central aim of the field of CSR is to reconcile (in the sense of “consilience”) methods and theories from the natural sciences with research on religion, which though defined in various ways, is usually understood as a universal human phenomenon. This does not necessarily mean religion is innate, but like all universal human phenomena, there will be an evolutionary story to tell about how it, or its constituent elements, came about. The stories are usually about the phenomena of religion writ-large, variously defined, rarely reaching the granularity to make claims about specific historical and cultural circumstances where religion is most relevant to agents. I challenge all scholars of religion to make their metaphysics explicit.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.relation.urihttps://brill.com/view/journals/mtsr/aop/article-10.1163-15700682-12341483/article-10.1163-15700682-12341483.xml
dc.titleYou Can Lead a Horse to Water, But You Can’t Make It Drinken_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.source.pagenumber259-266en_US
dc.source.volume32en_US
dc.source.journalMethod & Theory in the Study of Religionen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1163/15700682-12341483
dc.identifier.cristin1822099
dc.description.localcodeNot available due to copyright restrictionsen_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode2


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel