• norsk
    • English
  • norsk 
    • norsk
    • English
  • Logg inn
Vis innførsel 
  •   Hjem
  • Øvrige samlinger
  • Publikasjoner fra CRIStin - NTNU
  • Vis innførsel
  •   Hjem
  • Øvrige samlinger
  • Publikasjoner fra CRIStin - NTNU
  • Vis innførsel
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Analysis of Open-Source CFD Tools for Simulating Complex Hydrodynamic Problems

Siddiqui, Mohd Atif; XU, HUILI; Greco, Marilena; Colicchio, Giuseppina
Chapter
Published version
Thumbnail
Åpne
Siddiqui.pdf (2.076Mb)
Permanent lenke
https://hdl.handle.net/11250/2727726
Utgivelsesdato
2020
Metadata
Vis full innførsel
Samlinger
  • Institutt for marin teknikk [2413]
  • Publikasjoner fra CRIStin - NTNU [21000]
Originalversjon
10.1115/OMAE2020-18030
Sammendrag
OpenFOAM (OF) represents an attractive and widely used open-source environment for simulating complex hydrodynamic scenarios with several implemented numerical methods and wide variety of problems it can be applied to. For commercial and open-source solvers, though, expertise and experience are required to get physical and reliable results. Here, without pretending to be exhaustive, we aim to contribute in highlighting advantages and challenges of some key computational fluid dynamics (CFD)-simulation tools, with focus on the OF platform. We examine the effect of grid type, grid size and time-evolution scheme. Dynamic-mesh techniques and their influence on local and global numerical results are discussed, as well as the use of an overset grid versus a deforming mesh. Lastly, possible error sources in CFD simulations are discussed. These numerical studies are performed investigating two complex hydrodynamic problems: 1. a fully-immersed flapping hydrofoil aimed to generate thrust, 2. a damaged and an intact ship section fixed in beam-sea waves, in forced heave and roll motion in calm water. In the first case, vortex-shedding and wake features are crucial; in the second case, free-surface flow effects play the key role while the importance of vortex-shedding and viscous-flow effects depends on the scenario. The first problem is solved with OF and validated with results from benchmark experiments. The second problem is solved using (A) OF, (B) an in-house CFD solver and (C) a fully-nonlinear potential-flow code. A and B assume laminar-flow conditions and use, respectively, a volume-of-fluid and a level-set technique to handle the free-surface evolution. C is considered to examine importance of nonlinear versus viscous effects for the examined problems. The results are compared against in-house experiments.
Utgiver
ASME

Kontakt oss | Gi tilbakemelding

Personvernerklæring
DSpace software copyright © 2002-2019  DuraSpace

Levert av  Unit
 

 

Bla i

Hele arkivetDelarkiv og samlingerUtgivelsesdatoForfattereTitlerEmneordDokumenttyperTidsskrifterDenne samlingenUtgivelsesdatoForfattereTitlerEmneordDokumenttyperTidsskrifter

Min side

Logg inn

Statistikk

Besøksstatistikk

Kontakt oss | Gi tilbakemelding

Personvernerklæring
DSpace software copyright © 2002-2019  DuraSpace

Levert av  Unit