Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorOfstad, Endre Grüner
dc.contributor.authorMarkussen, Stine Svalheim
dc.contributor.authorSæther, Bernt-Erik
dc.contributor.authorSolberg, Erling Johan
dc.contributor.authorHeim, Morten
dc.contributor.authorHaanes, Hallvard
dc.contributor.authorRøed, Knut
dc.contributor.authorHerfindal, Ivar
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-02T09:14:39Z
dc.date.available2020-12-02T09:14:39Z
dc.date.created2020-05-13T20:52:09Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Animal Ecology. 2020, 89 (7), 1701-1710.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0021-8790
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2711355
dc.description.abstract1. Landscape changes are happening at an unprecedented pace, and together with high levels of wildlife harvesting humans have a large effect on wildlife populations. A thorough knowledge of their combined influence on individual fitness is important to understand factors affecting population dynamics. 2. The goal of the study was to assess the individual consistency in the use of risky habitat types, and how habitat use was related to fitness components and life‐history strategies. 3. Using data from a closely monitored and harvested population of moose Alces alces, we examined how individual variation in offspring size, reproduction and survival was related to the use of open grasslands; a habitat type that offers high‐quality forage during summer, but at the cost of being more exposed to hunters in autumn. The use of this habitat type may therefore involve a trade‐off between high mortality risk and forage maximization. 4. There was a high repeatability in habitat use, which suggests consistent behaviour within individuals. Offspring number and weight were positively related to the mothers' use of open grasslands, whereas the probability of surviving the subsequent harvest season was negatively related to the use of the same habitat type. As a consequence, we found a nonsignificant relationship between habitat use and lifetime fitness. 5. The study suggests that harvesting, even if intended to be nonselective with regard to phenotypes, may be selective towards animals with specific behaviour and life‐history strategies. As a consequence, harvesting can alter the life‐history composition of the population and target life‐history strategies that would be beneficial for individual fitness and population growth in the absence of hunting.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleOpposing fitness consequences of habitat use in a harvested moose populationen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.source.pagenumber1701-1710en_US
dc.source.volume89en_US
dc.source.journalJournal of Animal Ecologyen_US
dc.source.issue7en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/1365-2656.13221
dc.identifier.cristin1810884
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: 223257en_US
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: 244647en_US
dc.description.localcode© 2020 The Author. Journal of Animal Ecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Ecological Society This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode2


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal