Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.advisorMoses, Jonathonnb_NO
dc.contributor.authorSørås, Pedernb_NO
dc.date.accessioned2014-12-19T14:36:08Z
dc.date.available2014-12-19T14:36:08Z
dc.date.created2012-09-25nb_NO
dc.date.issued2012nb_NO
dc.identifier556443nb_NO
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/268553
dc.description.abstractConvergence theory has dominated the discussion of global financial governance. The perspective argues that the confrontation between the global market and state institutions leads to policy convergence. However, rather than accept this conclusion, this study has examined banking regulation in four countries, the United States, Canada, Britain, and Germany to test whether they converge. By comparing how these countries regulate banking in terms of policy interests, the study finds that there is indeed divergence between them in contrast to what convergence theory would predict.nb_NO
dc.languageengnb_NO
dc.publisherNorges teknisk-naturvitenskapelige universitet, Fakultet for samfunnsvitenskap og teknologiledelse, Institutt for sosiologi og statsvitenskapnb_NO
dc.subjectconvergenceen_GB
dc.titleHarnessing Global Finance: Is there divergence in global banking regulation?nb_NO
dc.typeMaster thesisnb_NO
dc.source.pagenumber87nb_NO
dc.contributor.departmentNorges teknisk-naturvitenskapelige universitet, Fakultet for samfunnsvitenskap og teknologiledelse, Institutt for sosiologi og statsvitenskapnb_NO


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel