Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorSovacool, Benjamin
dc.contributor.authorHess, David J.
dc.contributor.authorAmir, Sulfikar
dc.contributor.authorGeels, Frank W.
dc.contributor.authorHirsh, Richard
dc.contributor.authorRodriguez Medina, Leandro
dc.contributor.authorMiller, Clark
dc.contributor.authorAlvial Palavicino, Carla
dc.contributor.authorPhadke, Roopali
dc.contributor.authorRyghaug, Marianne
dc.contributor.authorSchot, Johan
dc.contributor.authorSilvast, Antti
dc.contributor.authorStephens, Jennie
dc.contributor.authorStirling, Andy
dc.contributor.authorTurnheim, Bruno
dc.contributor.authorvan der Vleuten, Erik
dc.contributor.authorvan Lente, Harro
dc.contributor.authorYearley, Steven
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-22T12:33:27Z
dc.date.available2020-10-22T12:33:27Z
dc.date.created2020-10-05T09:57:12Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.issn2214-6296
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2684517
dc.description.abstractThe field of science and technology studies (STS) has introduced and developed a “sociotechnical” perspective that has been taken up by many disciplines and areas of inquiry. The aims and objectives of this study are threefold: to interrogate which sociotechnical concepts or tools from STS are useful at better understanding energy-related social science, to reflect on prominent themes and topics within those approaches, and to identify current research gaps and directions for the future. To do so, the study builds on a companion project, a systematic analysis of 262 articles published from 2009 to mid-2019 that categorized and reviewed sociotechnical perspectives in energy social science. It identifies future research directions by employing the method of “co-creation” based on the reflections of sixteen prominent researchers in the field in late 2019 and early 2020. Drawing from this co-created synthesis, this study first identifies three main areas of sociotechnical perspectives in energy research (sociotechnical systems, policy, and expertise and publics) with 15 topics and 39 subareas. The study then identifies five main themes for the future development of sociotechnical perspectives in energy research: conditions of systematic change; embedded agency; justice, power, identity and politics; imaginaries and discourses; and public engagement and governance. It also points to the recognized need for pluralism and parallax: for research to show greater attention to demographic and geographical diversity; to stronger research designs; to greater theoretical triangulation; and to more transdisciplinary approaches.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleSociotechnical Agendas: Reviewing Future Directions for Energy and Climate Researchen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.source.volume70en_US
dc.source.journalEnergy Research & Social Scienceen_US
dc.source.issue101617en_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2020.101617
dc.identifier.cristin1836964
dc.description.localcode© 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/BY/4.0/).en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal