dc.contributor.author | Lunde, Lene | |
dc.contributor.author | Baerheim, Anders | |
dc.contributor.author | Johannessen, Ane | |
dc.contributor.author | Aase, Ingunn | |
dc.contributor.author | Almendingen, Kari | |
dc.contributor.author | Andersen, Irene Aasen | |
dc.contributor.author | Bengtsson, Rutt Venke | |
dc.contributor.author | Brenna, Sissel Johansson | |
dc.contributor.author | Hauksdottir, Nanna | |
dc.contributor.author | Steinsbekk, Aslak | |
dc.contributor.author | Rosvold, Elin Olaug | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-09-04T11:01:09Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-09-04T11:01:09Z | |
dc.date.created | 2020-09-02T08:58:58Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2020 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1356-1820 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/11250/2676411 | |
dc.description.abstract | This was a validation study of the Norwegian version of The Interprofessional Collaborative Competency Attainment Survey (ICCAS). ICCAS consists of 20 retrospective pre- and post-questions, where respondents rate their agreement with regard to self-assessed competencies after participating in interprofessional education courses. It has been validated across various settings. The questionnaire was translated using the back-translation technique. We investigated evidence of validity regarding content, response process, and internal structure. Data were obtained from health and social care students (n = 1440, response rate 42.8%) participating in 12 different interprofessional courses in seven education institutions in Norway using a cross-sectional design. Exploratory factor analysis indicated one retracted factor for pre-scores and one retracted factor for post-scores. High McDonald’s omega values indicated good internal consistency. Item deletion did not improve the scale’s overall consistency on pre- or post-scores. We observed higher mean post-scores than pre-scores with moderate-to-large effect sizes, indicating a positive change in self-assessed interprofessional capabilities after training. Our findings indicate that the Norwegian version of ICCAS is a valid tool that may be implemented across a wide range of interprofessional education courses. Finally, our findings support earlier recommendations that ICCAS should be analyzed at an overall level to address change in interprofessional capabilities. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | Taylor & Francis | en_US |
dc.rights | Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal | * |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no | * |
dc.title | Evidence of validity for the Norwegian version of the interprofessional collaborative competency attainment survey (ICCAS) | en_US |
dc.type | Peer reviewed | en_US |
dc.type | Journal article | en_US |
dc.description.version | publishedVersion | en_US |
dc.source.journal | Journal of Interprofessional Care | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1080/13561820.2020.1791806 | |
dc.identifier.cristin | 1826628 | |
dc.description.localcode | © 2020 The Author(s). Published with license by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. | en_US |
cristin.ispublished | true | |
cristin.fulltext | original | |
cristin.qualitycode | 1 | |