Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMatsen, Egilnb_NO
dc.contributor.authorThøgersen, Øysteinnb_NO
dc.date.accessioned2014-12-19T14:32:00Z
dc.date.available2014-12-19T14:32:00Z
dc.date.created2006-10-10nb_NO
dc.date.issued2002nb_NO
dc.identifier126133nb_NO
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/267185
dc.description.abstractPublic social security systems may provide diversification of risks to individuals’ life-time income. Capturing that a pay-as-you-go program (paygo) may be considered as a “quasiasset”, we study the optimal size of the social security program as well as the optimal split between a funded part and a paygo part by means of a theoretical portfolio choice approach. A low-yielding paygo system can benefit individuals if it contributes to hedge other risks to their lifetime resources. Moreover, a funded part of the social security system can be justified by potential imperfections to the individuals’ free access to the stock market. Numerical calculations for Sweden, Norway, the US and the UK demonstrate that the optimal size of paygo-part of the pension program varies considerably in response to differences in projected growth rates and the correlation between stock returns and growth. Our calculations suggest that a paygo program has an important role in the three former countries – but not in the U.K.nb_NO
dc.languageengnb_NO
dc.publisherInstitutt for samfunnsøkonominb_NO
dc.relation.ispartofseriesWorking Paper Series, 1503-299X; 2002:11nb_NO
dc.titleDesigning Social Security – A Portfolio Choice Approachnb_NO
dc.typeResearch reportnb_NO
dc.contributor.departmentNorges teknisk-naturvitenskapelige universitet, Fakultet for samfunnsvitenskap og teknologiledelse, Institutt for samfunnsøkonominb_NO


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record