Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorVignisdottir, Hrefna Run
dc.contributor.authorEbrahimi, Babak
dc.contributor.authorBooto, Gaylord Kabongo
dc.contributor.authorO'Born, Reyn Joseph
dc.contributor.authorBrattebø, Helge
dc.contributor.authorWallbaum, Holger
dc.contributor.authorBohne, Rolf André
dc.date.accessioned2020-05-14T10:23:49Z
dc.date.available2020-05-14T10:23:49Z
dc.date.created2019-11-22T13:46:49Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.issn0948-3349
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2654430
dc.description.abstractPurpose Winter road maintenance in the Nordic climate is demanding due to challenging weather conditions, high precipitation, and icy conditions. As a leading country in the transition to low-emission transport, Norway must work to reduce their emissions while providing a safe level of service through winter maintenance operations. This article investigates the environmental impacts of winter road maintenance (WRM) in Norway both today and under a climate change scenario predicted for 2050. Methods Life cycle assessment (LCA) is used to evaluate the environmental impact of the functional unit “average winter road maintenance in Norway on national and county roads per km.lane.” The ReCiPe (hierarchy) method was used to identify and categorize emissions related to WRM to show how different factors affect the system and to reveal hidden emissions hotspots. Real-time data from WRM vehicles were used to determine how fuel consumption is affected by gradient and weather. Producers and operators provided other relevant information on WRM vehicles. Official reports supplied information on deicer quantities used and the total distance driven by WRM vehicles in Norway. Results and discussion The quantity of deicer used is the main source of emissions contributing toward all impact categories. The effect of deicer is likely to be even higher in certain impact categories. The environmental impact of the deicer after application is not included. The representation of WRM in existing emissions data is limited despite the considerable amount of deicer applied and the long distances that WRM vehicles travel. The results document how energy use throughout the system is another important source of emissions. Various parameters, such as road gradient, vehicle properties, driver behavior, and weather, affect the fuel consumption of WRM vehicles, with weather being the most important of these. Conclusions Significant potential for emissions reductions from WRM was found, and WRM operations should be included in cold-climate road LCA studies. The environmental impacts of deicer application are especially high compared to the mechanical clearing of roads and contribute strongly to impact categories such as terrestrial, freshwater, and human toxicity and to the formation of particulate matter.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.titleLife cycle assessment of winter road maintenanceen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.source.journalThe International Journal of Life Cycle Assessmenten_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s11367-019-01682-y
dc.identifier.cristin1751046
dc.description.localcodeThis article will not be available due to copyright restrictions (c) 2019 by Springeren_US
cristin.unitcode194,64,91,0
cristin.unitcode194,64,25,0
cristin.unitnameInstitutt for bygg- og miljøteknikk
cristin.unitnameInstitutt for energi- og prosessteknikk
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode2


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel