Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorDahle, Stine Veronica Wiborg
dc.contributor.authorBakke, Ingrid
dc.contributor.authorBirkeland, Mari
dc.contributor.authorNordøy, Kristian
dc.contributor.authorDalum, Alf Seljenes
dc.contributor.authorAttramadal, Kari
dc.date.accessioned2020-04-24T07:26:46Z
dc.date.available2020-04-24T07:26:46Z
dc.date.created2020-02-14T13:02:10Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationAquaculture. 2020, 522en_US
dc.identifier.issn0044-8486
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2652325
dc.description.abstractLumpfish in Norway is currently produced in traditional flow-through systems (FTS). Hatcheries frequently show signs of bacterial infections, unstable microbial communities in the rearing water and varying mortality. Recirculating Aquaculture Systems (RAS) is proposed to create stable and healthy microbial environments, with less probabilities for blooming of opportunistic microbes. Studies have also shown that RAS increases the survival of marine fish. The aim with this study was to investigate effect of various RAS water treatment designs on water and biofilm microbiota, survival, growth and gill health of lumpfish. An experiment with lumpfish was conducted, from 2 months post hatch to the transfer into sea cages. Five different water treatment regimens were compared: 1. RAS with no additional water treatment, 2. RAS with a filtration unit for removal of small particles, 3. RAS with filtration and disinfection with UV-irradiation, 4. RAS with filtration and disinfection with UV-irradiation and ozone and 5. FTS as a reference. The microbiota of the rearing water and tank wall biofilm were sampled and characterized by Illumina sequencing of 16S rDNA amplicons. Lumpfish juveniles reared in the RAS treatments were exposed to a more stable and diverse rearing water microbiota, with a lower share of opportunistic bacteria, a probable reason for the higher survival and better gill health of the fish compared to siblings reared in the FTS. Compared to siblings reared in RAS with disinfection and in FTS, lumpfish reared in RAS without disinfection were exposed to a more diverse and stable water microbiota, with a lower share of opportunistic bacteria. This resulted in better gill health. Fish in RAS with filtration, but no disinfection, had a better gill health than the fish in the RAS without removal of small particles, possibly due to the reduction of small particles. The lumpfish were exposed to different microbial communities of both water and biofilm, due to the different treatments of the incoming tank water. In conclusion, our results indicate that implementation of RAS in the production of lumpfish has a potential to increase both survival, growth and gill health of the fish and that RAS with filtration of small particles, but without disinfection, result in the best fish health and performance among the investigated treatments.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleProduction of lumpfish in RAS with distinct water treatments: Effects on fish survival, growth, gill health and microbial communities in rearing water and biofilmen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.source.volume522en_US
dc.source.journalAquacultureen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.aquaculture.2020.735097
dc.identifier.cristin1794193
dc.description.localcodeThis is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons CC-BY license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.en_US
cristin.ispublishedfalse
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal