Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSimmonds, Emily Grace
dc.contributor.authorCole, Ella F
dc.contributor.authorSheldon, Ben C
dc.contributor.authorCoulson, Tim
dc.date.accessioned2020-04-17T09:21:48Z
dc.date.available2020-04-17T09:21:48Z
dc.date.created2019-12-19T15:58:06Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.issn0030-1299
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2651472
dc.description.abstractGlobal climate change is altering the timing of life history events for species living in seasonal environments. These shifts in phenology can lead to the disruption of interspecific relationships with implications for individual fitness. Predicting phenological change and its population level consequences can provide insights into population persistence. Achieving this is challenging for labile traits as current structured population models do not explicitly distinguish between the roles of phenotypic plasticity and micro‐evolution, hindering realistic predictions of trait change. In this study we present the first empirical test of a new integral projection model (IPM) framework, which allows phenotypic plasticity and micro‐evolution to be teased apart by incorporating a quantitative genetic inheritance function. We parameterise this model for a population of wild great tits Parus major and test its predictive capabilities through K‐fold cross validation. We test the predictive accuracy of the quantitative genetic IPM in comparison to the standard IPM. We demonstrate that adding genetic inheritance rules maintains high accuracy of projections of phenological change, relative to the standard IPM. In addition, we find almost identical projections of population dynamics in this population for both IPMs, demonstrating that this model formulation allows researchers to investigate the contributions of phenotypic plasticity and micro‐evolution to trait change, without sacrificing predictive accuracy. Modelling in this way reveals that, under directional environmental change, both micro‐evolution and plasticity contribute to an advance of phenology, although the effect of plasticity is an order of magnitude higher than evolution. Despite this, synchrony between great tits and their caterpillar prey was reduced and population declines occurred. Our approach demonstrates that this model framework provides a promising avenue through which to explore the roles of phenotypic plasticity and evolution in trait changes and population dynamics.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleTesting the effect of quantitative genetic inheritance in structured models on projections of population dynamicsen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.source.journalOikosen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/oik.06985
dc.identifier.cristin1763113
dc.description.localcode© 2019 Nordic Society Oikos. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.en_US
cristin.unitcode194,63,15,0
cristin.unitnameInstitutt for matematiske fag
cristin.ispublishedfalse
cristin.fulltextpostprint
cristin.qualitycode2


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal