Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorGordt, Katharina
dc.contributor.authorMikolaizak, A. Stefanie
dc.contributor.authorTaraldsen, Kristin
dc.contributor.authorBergquist, Ronny
dc.contributor.authorVan Ancum, Jeanine M.
dc.contributor.authorNerz, Corinna
dc.contributor.authorPijnappels, Mirjam
dc.contributor.authorMaier, Andrea B.
dc.contributor.authorHelbostad, Jorunn L.
dc.contributor.authorVereijken, Egberta
dc.contributor.authorBecker, Clemens
dc.contributor.authorSchwenk, Michael
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-31T09:08:58Z
dc.date.available2020-03-31T09:08:58Z
dc.date.created2020-03-03T14:35:36Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.issn0031-9023
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2649604
dc.description.abstractBackground The Community Balance and Mobility Scale (CBM) has been shown to be reliable and valid for detecting subtle balance and mobility deficits in people who are 61 to 70 years of age. However, item redundancy and assessment time call for a shortened version. Objective The objective was to create and validate a shortened version of the CBM (s-CBM) without detectable loss of psychometric properties. Design This was a cross-sectional study. Methods Exploratory factor analysis with data from 189 young seniors (aged 61-70 years; mean [SD] age = 66.3 [2.5] years) was used to create the s-CBM. Sixty-one young seniors (aged 61–70 years; mean [SD] age = 66.5 [2.6] years) were recruited to assess construct validity (Pearson correlation coefficient) by comparing the CBM versions with Fullerton Advance Balance Scale, Timed Up-and-Go, habitual and fast gait speed, 8 Level Balance Scale, 3-m tandem walk, and 30-second chair stand test. Internal consistency (Cronbach α), ceiling effects, and discriminant validity (area under the curve [AUC]) between fallers and nonfallers, and self-reported high and low function (Late-Life Function and Disability Index) and balance confidence (Activities-Specific Balance Confidence Scale), respectively, were calculated. Results The s-CBM, consisting of 4 items, correlated excellently with the CBM (r = 0.97). Correlations between s-CBM and other assessments (r = 0.07-0.72), and CBM and other assessments (r = 0.06-0.80) were statistically comparable in 90% of the correlations. Cronbach α was .84 for the s-CBM, and .87 for the CBM. No CBM-version showed ceiling effects. Discriminative ability of the s-CBM was statistically comparable with the CBM (AUC = 0.66-0.75 vs AUC = 0.65-0.79). Limitations Longitudinal studies with larger samples should confirm the results and assess the responsiveness for detecting changes over time. Conclusions The psychometric properties of the s-CBM were similar to those of the CBM. The s-CBM can be recommended as a valid and quick balance and mobility assessment in young seniors.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherOxford University Pressen_US
dc.titleCreating and Validating a Shortened Version of the Community Balance and Mobility Scale for Application in People Who Are 61 to 70 Years of Ageen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionacceptedVersionen_US
dc.source.journalPhysical Therapyen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/ptj/pzz132
dc.identifier.cristin1799348
dc.description.localcodeThis is a pre-copyedited, author-produced version of an article accepted for publication in Physical Therapy following peer review. The version of record is available online at: https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/pzz132en_US
cristin.unitcode194,65,30,0
cristin.unitcode1920,7,0,0
cristin.unitnameInstitutt for nevromedisin og bevegelsesvitenskap
cristin.unitnameKlinikk for kliniske servicefunksjoner
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode2


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel