Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorFossum, Knut Robert
dc.contributor.authorAarseth, Wenche
dc.contributor.authorAndersen, Bjørn
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-23T09:06:36Z
dc.date.available2020-03-23T09:06:36Z
dc.date.created2019-08-30T15:27:26Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.issn1753-8378
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2648022
dc.description.abstractPurpose The purpose of this paper is to explore scenario development (SD) as a method for engaging known challenges in collaborative research projects, i.e. SD is the construct under investigation. Design/methodology/approach Criticism of the dominant, rational approach to project management (PM) and its underlying hypotheses highlights a considerable PM research gap for research projects (research problem). The authors undertake a six-step constructive research approach to investigate if SD (the construct) constitutes a fruitful method to support the management of collaborative research projects. A two-part literature review summarizes known challenges in collaborative research projects and introduces the history and application of SD methodology. The work includes participatory action research (PAR) in two case studies, constituting a qualitative research method. Findings The authors found the SD method to be useful for structuring and analyzing intuitive project processes. However, using SD in the management of single projects presents some fundamental challenges. SD, like PM, struggles with issues related to myopic decisions, a “predict and provide” attitude with clear aspects of path dependency in the project front-end as well as inconsistent and/or missing identification of success criteria among different stakeholders. Research limitations/implications This paper does not provide any comprehensive, normative account of scenario techniques or compare SD with other foresight and future studies methods. Although PAR is in itself a research method that demands systematic description and execution, the focus of this paper is the overall constructive research approach. Practical implications The paper offers a broadened repertoire of methods to describe and analyse project stakeholder situations (collaborative aspects) and to structure and balance the need for both rational and intuitive project processes (research aspects). The SD method also supports development of graphical storylines and facilitates the use of influence diagrams, event trees and cost/benefit analysis. Originality/value Although PM literature contains several references to SD, the practical application of SD at single-project level has, to the authors’ knowledge, never been described in the PM literature.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherEmeralden_US
dc.titleExploring scenario development – a case study of two collaborative research projectsen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionacceptedVersionen_US
dc.source.journalInternational Journal of Managing Projects in Businessen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1108/IJMPB-08-2018-0145
dc.identifier.cristin1720167
dc.description.localcode© 2019. This is the authors' accepted and refereed manuscript to the article. The final authenticated version is available online at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/IJMPB-08-2018-0145en_US
cristin.unitcode194,64,92,0
cristin.unitnameInstitutt for maskinteknikk og produksjon
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextpreprint
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel