Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAksnessæther, Bjørg Yksnøy
dc.contributor.authorLund, Jo-Åsmund
dc.contributor.authorMyklebust, Tor Åge
dc.contributor.authorKlepp, Olbjørn
dc.contributor.authorSkovlund, Eva
dc.contributor.authorHoff, Solveig Roth
dc.contributor.authorSolberg, Arne
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-03T07:37:42Z
dc.date.available2020-03-03T07:37:42Z
dc.date.created2019-06-07T13:22:28Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citationActa Oncologica. 2019, 58 (6), 838-844.nb_NO
dc.identifier.issn0284-186X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2644780
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: The aim of this registry-based cohort study was to estimate second cancer (SC) risk following radical prostate cancer (PC) treatment and evaluate if the risk was influenced by radiotherapy. Materials and methods: We collected data from the Cancer Registry of Norway on all patients with PC as first cancer diagnosis, from 1997 to 2014. Standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) for SC were calculated by comparing our cohort to the standard male population. Subdistribution hazard ratios were estimated in treatment groups, using patients treated with radical prostatectomy (RP) as reference. Results: We analyzed 24,592 radically treated PC patients. The median follow-up was 7.75 and 6.25 years in the external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and RP-groups, respectively. SIR for SC was indifferent from the reference population in 24,592 radically treated patients, higher following EBRT, SIR 1.12 (1.07–1.17), and lower following RP, SIR 0.93 (0.87–0.99). EBRT treated patients had higher rectal and urinary bladder cancer incidences, SIR 1.38 (1.16–1.64) and 1.49 (1.31–1.69), respectively. The EBRT patients and the patients treated with radiation after RP (RT after RP) had 38 and 27% higher risk of any SC. We found higher risk of bladder cancer for all treatment groups as compared to RP patients. Only EBRT treated patients showed higher risk of rectal and lung cancer. Discussion/conclusions: In our study, we found that PC patients treated with EBRT had an increased incidence of SC compared to the general population. Patients treated with EBRT and RT after RP were found to have increased risk of SCs, using RP patients as reference. The risks of rectal and urinary bladder cancer in patients receiving EBRT were higher compared to both the general population and to patients treated with radical prostatectomy. The risk of SC should be taken into account when discussing treatment for patients and designing follow-up.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherTaylor & Francisnb_NO
dc.titleSecond cancers in radically treated Norwegian prostate cancer patientsnb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer reviewednb_NO
dc.description.versionacceptedVersionnb_NO
dc.source.pagenumber838-844nb_NO
dc.source.volume58nb_NO
dc.source.journalActa Oncologicanb_NO
dc.source.issue6nb_NO
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/0284186X.2019.1581377
dc.identifier.cristin1703485
dc.description.localcodeLocked until 25 March 2020 due to copyright restrictions. This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Acta Oncologica on 25 March 2019, available at https://doi.org/10.1080/0284186X.2019.1581377.nb_NO
cristin.unitcode194,65,15,0
cristin.unitcode194,65,20,0
cristin.unitcode1920,12,0,0
cristin.unitnameInstitutt for klinisk og molekylær medisin
cristin.unitnameInstitutt for samfunnsmedisin og sykepleie
cristin.unitnameKreftklinikken
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextpostprint
cristin.qualitycode1


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record