Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorHofmann, Bjørn Morten
dc.date.accessioned2020-02-27T14:21:01Z
dc.date.available2020-02-27T14:21:01Z
dc.date.created2019-11-10T00:20:17Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citationAmerican Journal of Epidemiology. 2019, 188 (10), 1812-1817.nb_NO
dc.identifier.issn0002-9262
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2644245
dc.description.abstractEpidemiologic studies of overdiagnosis are challenged by unclear definitions and the absence of unified measures. This spurs great controversies. Etymologically, overdiagnosis means too much diagnosis and stems from the inability to distinguish what is important from what is not. Accordingly, in order to grasp, measure, and handle overdiagnosis, we should revive medicine’s original goal and reconnect diagnosis to what matters to professionals and patients: knowledge and suffering, respectively. This will make overdiagnosis easier to define and measure, and eventually less difficult to reduce.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherOxford University Press (OUP)nb_NO
dc.titleBack to Basics: Overdiagnosis Is About Unwarranted Diagnosisnb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer reviewednb_NO
dc.description.versionacceptedVersionnb_NO
dc.source.pagenumber1812-1817nb_NO
dc.source.volume188nb_NO
dc.source.journalAmerican Journal of Epidemiologynb_NO
dc.source.issue10nb_NO
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/aje/kwz148
dc.identifier.cristin1745705
dc.description.localcodeLocked until 25.6.2020 due to copyright restrictions. This is a pre-copyedited, author-produced version of an article accepted for publication in [American Journal of Epidemiology] following peer review. The version of record is available online at: https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwz148nb_NO
cristin.unitcode194,65,70,0
cristin.unitnameInstitutt for helsevitenskap Gjøvik
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextpreprint
cristin.fulltextpostprint
cristin.qualitycode2


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel