Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorRavlo, Merethe
dc.contributor.authorLieng, Marit
dc.contributor.authorBukholm, Ida Rashida Khan
dc.contributor.authorMoen, Mette Haase
dc.contributor.authorVanky, Eszter
dc.date.accessioned2020-02-21T06:55:49Z
dc.date.available2020-02-21T06:55:49Z
dc.date.created2019-06-21T15:18:38Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citationActa Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica. 2019, 98 (8), 1070-1076.nb_NO
dc.identifier.issn0001-6349
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2643089
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: The Norwegian System of Patient Injury Compensation (NPE) evalu-ates all patient‐reported claims in Norway. Our aim was to study the cases from gy-necological patients approved by NPE in order to identify the main reasons for the injuries, the consequences of the treatment failure for the women, and the time course when the treatment failure occurred.Material and methods: A retrospective, descriptive study of approved gynecological compensation claims during a 14‐year period, based on patient files from NPE.Results: In all, 1454 women claimed compensation for injury related to gynecological treatment in Norway from 2000 to 2013. Compensation was approved for 438 (30.1%) women. Eleven women declined participation in the study and 16 cases were excluded, leaving 411 cases for further analyses. Consent to participate was given by 211 (51.3%) women, who gave full access to all their NPE files. Anonymized resumes and expert statements were used for the 138 (33.6%) women who did not respond and the 62 (15.1%) women who were deceased. Guidelines or good clinical practice were not followed in 40.5% of the cases. The most common reasons for injury were surgical complications (67.6%), delayed (22.4%) and incorrect (17.0%) diagnoses, and failure of communication (11.7%). The main consequences of injuries were need for extensive treatment (64.2%), permanent injury (55.2%) and impaired physical ability (41.9%). Worsening of cancer prognosis occurred in 58 women (14.1%) and death due to treatment failure in 29 (7.1%) women. Most failures occurred during the treatment period (75.2%).Conclusions: We found that the main reason for injuries in gynecological patients was non‐adherence to guidelines or good clinical practice. Surgery‐related injuries were most common. Increased focus on adherence to guidelines and surgical skills might improve patient safety for gynecological patients in Norway.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherWileynb_NO
dc.titleApproved claims for compensation from gynecological patients in Norway?What characterizes the cases? A 14-year nationwide studynb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer reviewednb_NO
dc.description.versionacceptedVersionnb_NO
dc.source.pagenumber1070-1076nb_NO
dc.source.volume98nb_NO
dc.source.journalActa Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavicanb_NO
dc.source.issue8nb_NO
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/aogs.13605
dc.identifier.cristin1706860
dc.description.localcodeLocked until 12.03.2020 due to copyright restrictions. This is the peer reviewed version of an article, which has been published in final form at 10.1111/aogs.13605. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Self-Archiving.nb_NO
cristin.unitcode194,65,15,0
cristin.unitcode1920,13,0,0
cristin.unitnameInstitutt for klinisk og molekylær medisin
cristin.unitnameKvinneklinikken
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextpostprint
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel