Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorGlerup, Mia
dc.contributor.authorRypdal, Veronika Gjertsen
dc.contributor.authorArnstad, Ellen Dalen
dc.contributor.authorEkelund, Maria
dc.contributor.authorPeltoniemi, Suvi
dc.contributor.authorAalto, Kristiina
dc.contributor.authorRygg, Marite
dc.contributor.authorToftedal, Peter
dc.contributor.authorNielsen, Susan
dc.contributor.authorFasth, Anders
dc.contributor.authorBerntson, Lillemor
dc.contributor.authorNordal, Ellen Berit
dc.contributor.authorHerlin, Troels
dc.date.accessioned2020-02-17T16:06:03Z
dc.date.available2020-02-17T16:06:03Z
dc.date.created2020-01-10T15:15:00Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.issn2151-464X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2642089
dc.description.abstractObjectives This study assessed the long‐term course, remission rate and disease burden in juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) 18 years after disease onset in a population‐based setting from the early biologic era. Methods A total of 510 consecutive cases of JIA with disease onset between 1997 and 2000 from defined geographic regions in Denmark, Norway, Sweden and Finland were prospectively included in this 18‐year cohort study. At the follow‐up visit, patient‐reported, demographic and clinical data were collected. Results The study included 434 (85%) of the 510 eligible JIA participants. The mean age ± SD was 24.0 ± 4.4 years. The median juvenile arthritis disease activity (JADAS71) score was 1.5 (IQR 0‐5), with the ERA category of JIA having the highest median score, 4.5 (IQR 1.5–8.5) (P=0.003). In this cohort, 46% still had active disease, and 66 (15%) were treated with synthetic disease‐modifying anti‐rheumatic drugs and 84 (19%) with biologics. Inactive disease indicated by JADAS71 <1 was seen in 48% of participants. Clinical remission off medication (CR) was documented in 33% of the participants with high variability among the JIA categories. CR was most often seen in persistent oligoarticular and systemic arthritis and least often in ERA (P<0.001). Conclusions A high prevalence of the JIA cohort did not achieve CR despite new treatment options during the study period. The ERA category showed the worst outcomes and, in general, there is still a high burden of disease in adulthood for JIA.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherWileynb_NO
dc.titleLong-term outcomes in juvenile idiopathic arthritis: 18 years of follow-up in the population-based Nordic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (JIA) cohort.nb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer reviewednb_NO
dc.description.versionacceptedVersionnb_NO
dc.source.journalArthritis care & researchnb_NO
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/acr.23853
dc.identifier.cristin1770458
dc.description.localcodeThis is the peer reviewed version of an article, which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.23853. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Self-Archiving.nb_NO
cristin.unitcode194,65,15,0
cristin.unitcode1920,1,0,0
cristin.unitnameInstitutt for klinisk og molekylær medisin
cristin.unitnameBarne- og ungdomsklinikken
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextpostprint
cristin.qualitycode2


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel