Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorNaversen, Christian Øyn
dc.contributor.authorFarahmand, Hossein
dc.contributor.authorHelseth, Arild
dc.date.accessioned2020-02-12T07:09:09Z
dc.date.available2020-02-12T07:09:09Z
dc.date.created2020-02-11T14:44:02Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems. 2020, 119 (105864),nb_NO
dc.identifier.issn0142-0615
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2641160
dc.description.abstractAs the penetration of variable renewable power generation increases in power systems around the world, system security is challenged. It is crucial to coordinate the available flexible generating resources, such as hydropower, to meet the need for system balancing. However, reserved capacity on hydropower plants should only be activated if there is sufficient energy or storage capacity to either increase or decrease production. The potential change in production will also affect all reservoirs and plants connected by the cascaded topology. These issues are largely ignored or simplified in hydropower reserve scheduling models. To properly account for the possible activation of reserved capacity, several two-stage model formulations based on stochastic and robust optimization are presented and compared in this paper. The uncertainty in net load deviations due to forecasting errors in renewable power generation is considered the source of reserve capacity activation. The case study based on a real Norwegian watercourse clearly shows the benefit of using any of the two-stage model solutions over the standard deterministic reserve procurement. A novel hybrid stochastic-robust model formulation is presented and shown to efficiently increase the robustness of the solution without notably increasing the reserve procurement cost compared to the stochastic and robust models.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherElseviernb_NO
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleAccounting for reserve capacity activation when scheduling a hydropower dominated systemnb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer reviewednb_NO
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionnb_NO
dc.source.volume119nb_NO
dc.source.journalInternational Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systemsnb_NO
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ijepes.2020.105864
dc.identifier.cristin1793080
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: 268014nb_NO
dc.description.localcodeOpen Access CC-BYnb_NO
cristin.unitcode194,63,20,0
cristin.unitnameInstitutt for elkraftteknikk
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal