Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorLarose, Tricia L
dc.contributor.authorTurner, Steve W
dc.contributor.authorHutcheon, Jennifer A
dc.contributor.authorRogne, Tormod
dc.contributor.authorRiphagen, Ingrid Ingeborg
dc.contributor.authorMartinussen, Marit
dc.contributor.authorJacobsen, Geir Wenberg
dc.date.accessioned2019-11-14T06:43:30Z
dc.date.available2019-11-14T06:43:30Z
dc.date.created2017-03-21T17:44:05Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.citationCurrent Epidemiology Reports. 2017, 4 (2), 98-105.nb_NO
dc.identifier.issn2196-2995
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2628384
dc.description.abstractPurpose of Review In this narrative review, we outline recent evidence relating longitudinal ultrasound (US) measurements to offspring outcomes in the perinatal period and in childhood, with an emphasis on the methodological approaches for describing fetal growth. Recent Findings The utility of longitudinal ultrasonography (US) to measure fetal growth and determine fetal trajectories is valued in both clinical and research environments. Evidence shows that repeated measures of US throughout pregnancy are useful for distinguishing between a growth-restricted and constitutionally small fetus, the former burdened by adverse clinical outcomes. Fetal growth restriction and small for gestational age are not interchangeable terms, although both can exist in the same individual. Summary The application of longitudinal US may have predictive value when determining longer-term health and disease outcomes in offspring born growth-restricted. However, it is important to remember that associations between fetal growth restriction and increased risk for non-communicable diseases are likely modified by postnatal growth.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherSpringer Verlagnb_NO
dc.titleLongitudinal ultrasound measures of fetal growth and offspring outcomesnb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionnb_NO
dc.source.pagenumber98-105nb_NO
dc.source.volume4nb_NO
dc.source.journalCurrent Epidemiology Reportsnb_NO
dc.source.issue2nb_NO
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s40471-017-0103-2
dc.identifier.cristin1460183
dc.description.localcodeThis article will not be available due to copyright restrictions (c) 2017 by Springernb_NO
cristin.unitcode194,65,20,0
cristin.unitcode194,65,1,0
cristin.unitcode194,65,15,0
cristin.unitnameInstitutt for samfunnsmedisin og sykepleie
cristin.unitnameMH fakultetsadministrasjon
cristin.unitnameInstitutt for klinisk og molekylær medisin
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel